Annals of emergency medicine · 1992
Plain abdominal radiography in the detection of major disease in children: a prospective analysis.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rothrock S G, Green S M, Hummel C B
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate previously described high-yield clinical criteria for obtaining plain abdominal radiographs in the emergency evaluation of children.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study.
SETTING: Emergency departments of a university medical center and an affiliated county hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred fifty-four children 15 years old or younger who underwent plain abdominal radiography during a one-year period.
METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS: Physicians ordering plain abdominal radiographs completed data forms that included historical and physical examination information before viewing films. At a later date, records of all patients were reviewed for radiologist interpretation and final diagnosis. The data were analyzed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of previously described high-yield criteria (from a retrospective series) in detecting radiographs that were diagnostic or suggestive of "major" abdominal disease.
MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (17%) had major diseases potentially requiring procedural intervention (eg, appendicitis, ingested foreign bodies, and intussusception), whereas 296 patients (83%) had minor diseases not requiring procedural intervention (eg, gastroenteritis and nonabdominal diagnoses). The presence of any of the following features--prior abdominal surgery, foreign body ingestion, abnormal bowel sounds, abdominal distention, or peritoneal signs--was 93% sensitive and 40% specific in detecting diagnostic or suggestive radiographs in patients with major disease. Positive and negative predictive values were 11% and 99%, respectively. If only these criteria had been used to obtain radiographs, 38% of films would have been omitted (at an estimated savings of $20,000) with only two suggestive radiographs missed.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that restricting abdominal radiographs to patients with at least one of these five high-yield clinical features will detect most diagnostic and suggestive radiographs in children with major abdominal diseases.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study.
SETTING: Emergency departments of a university medical center and an affiliated county hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred fifty-four children 15 years old or younger who underwent plain abdominal radiography during a one-year period.
METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS: Physicians ordering plain abdominal radiographs completed data forms that included historical and physical examination information before viewing films. At a later date, records of all patients were reviewed for radiologist interpretation and final diagnosis. The data were analyzed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of previously described high-yield criteria (from a retrospective series) in detecting radiographs that were diagnostic or suggestive of "major" abdominal disease.
MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (17%) had major diseases potentially requiring procedural intervention (eg, appendicitis, ingested foreign bodies, and intussusception), whereas 296 patients (83%) had minor diseases not requiring procedural intervention (eg, gastroenteritis and nonabdominal diagnoses). The presence of any of the following features--prior abdominal surgery, foreign body ingestion, abnormal bowel sounds, abdominal distention, or peritoneal signs--was 93% sensitive and 40% specific in detecting diagnostic or suggestive radiographs in patients with major disease. Positive and negative predictive values were 11% and 99%, respectively. If only these criteria had been used to obtain radiographs, 38% of films would have been omitted (at an estimated savings of $20,000) with only two suggestive radiographs missed.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that restricting abdominal radiographs to patients with at least one of these five high-yield clinical features will detect most diagnostic and suggestive radiographs in children with major abdominal diseases.