DOI 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2025-0263en
Epidemiology of chronic dialysis treatment among children and adolescents in a capital of Northeastern Brazil.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Information about the clinical and epidemiological profile of children and adolescents undergoing chronic dialysis in Brazil is limited.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the pediatric population undergoing chronic outpatient dialysis treatment in a capital city in Northeastern Brazil.
METHODS
This is a descriptive, observational, and retrospective study whose population consisted of all children and adolescents undergoing chronic outpatient dialysis treatment in São Luís, capital of the state of Maranhão, Brazil, in 2023.
RESULTS
Thirty-two children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were undergoing dialysis treatment during this period, the majority (56.25%) being male. The mean age was 11.31 years (± 3.56). Regarding ethnicity, non-white individuals predominated (71.9%). The renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality was exclusively hemodialysis (HD), and the most commonly used vascular access at the end of the follow-up period was arteriovenous fistula (AVF) (56.2%). Regarding the underlying disease, 35% had an unknown etiology. There were nine transplants during the period, all from deceased donors. At that time, there was virtually universal access to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and drugs for the prevention and treatment of bone mineral metabolic disorders.
CONCLUSION
The high rate of unknown underlying disease and the exclusive use of HD as the RRT modality, rather than peritoneal dialysis, reflect diagnostic, therapeutic, and structural challenges. This scenario highlights the need for better planning of public policies aimed at managing pediatric CKD in the region.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.