International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2022
Management outcomes of otitis media with effusion in children with down syndrome: A systematic review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sait Salam, Alamoudi Sarah, Zawawi Faisal
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assesses the current state of uncertainty concerning the management options used for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children with trisomy 21.
REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review of adhering to the PRISMA statement of studies evaluating the management of OME in trisomy 21 children prior to September 2021 was conducted. Studies were identified using the following medical databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Scopus and Medline. Data extraction was performed by screening of titles and abstracts based on eligibility criteria, followed by full-article analysis of selected records.
RESULTS: Twenty articles were included in this review. Studies showed conflicting outcomes regarding the different interventions used for OME in children with trisomy 21. Of those evaluating pressure equalizing tubes (PET), some studies report pronounced complication rates and recommend using a conservative approach unless complications arise and/or hearing loss is severe. In contrast, other studies reported significantly reduced complication rates and improved hearing with earlier intervention and adaptations to PETs. Hearing aids may be provided after multiple failed PETs.
CONCLUSION: Clinical equipoise still persists regarding the best method to manage children with trisomy 21 who have OME. Although PETs exhibited the lowest complication rates and highest improvement rates, further prospective trials are warranted to assess the various treatment modalities and determine which of them would provide the best outcome while reducing complications as well as the age of treatment.
REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review of adhering to the PRISMA statement of studies evaluating the management of OME in trisomy 21 children prior to September 2021 was conducted. Studies were identified using the following medical databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Scopus and Medline. Data extraction was performed by screening of titles and abstracts based on eligibility criteria, followed by full-article analysis of selected records.
RESULTS: Twenty articles were included in this review. Studies showed conflicting outcomes regarding the different interventions used for OME in children with trisomy 21. Of those evaluating pressure equalizing tubes (PET), some studies report pronounced complication rates and recommend using a conservative approach unless complications arise and/or hearing loss is severe. In contrast, other studies reported significantly reduced complication rates and improved hearing with earlier intervention and adaptations to PETs. Hearing aids may be provided after multiple failed PETs.
CONCLUSION: Clinical equipoise still persists regarding the best method to manage children with trisomy 21 who have OME. Although PETs exhibited the lowest complication rates and highest improvement rates, further prospective trials are warranted to assess the various treatment modalities and determine which of them would provide the best outcome while reducing complications as well as the age of treatment.