MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.10.026

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2018

Prevalence of bifid uvula in primary school children.

Feka Pranvera, Banon Jacqueline, Leuchter Igor, La Scala Giorgio C

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A bifid uvula is an anatomic variation that can be predictive of sub-mucous cleft palate, which may cause velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). Bifid uvula prevalence in the literature ranges from 0.18% to 10.3%, depending on the population studied. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of bifid uvula in the Geneva's school children population.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in Geneva's primary school children, from September 2014 to June 2015. An examination of the uvula was performed by dentists working for the Scholastic Dental Service, after a specific training in diagnosing bifid uvulas. The dentists recorded their findings on a standardized form.

RESULTS

The total number of school children in Geneva in the school year 2014-2015 was 30,375. 23,961 children had their uvula examined, representing 79% of the total population of school children. Among them, a hundred school children had a cleft uvula. One schoolgirl had no uvula. The prevalence of bifid uvula is 0.42%. Sex ratio (M/F) is 0.96.

DISCUSSION: This large study, the second in literature for number of patients examined, identified a prevalence of bifid uvula of 0.42%. This result is in agreement with previous studies.

Для цитирования: Feka Pranvera, Banon Jacqueline, Leuchter Igor, La Scala Giorgio C. Prevalence of bifid uvula in primary school children.. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.10.026.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.