Lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach vs. olecranon osteotomy approach: an anatomic study of cadavers.

BACKGROUND

Exposure of the articular surface is the key to successful open reduction and internal fixation treatment for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus. The olecranon osteotomy approach has previously been described as one of the most effective exposure approaches. Nevertheless, this approach cannot expose the anterior trochlea, and it is impossible to reduce and fix the capitellum under direct vision. The purpose of this study was to compare the exposure of the articular surface of the distal humerus between the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach (group L) and the olecranon osteotomy approach (group O).

METHODS

Each approach was performed on 8 freshly frozen upper limbs of adult cadavers. After each approach was completed, a 0.5-mm Kirschner wire is inserted along the edge to mark the visible part of the articular surface. Then, the soft tissue of each elbow is removed, and a surface-scanning system is used to create a digital 3-dimensional model. The visible part of the articular surface obtained by each surgical approach was mapped and quantified using markers created by Kirschner wires.

RESULTS

The lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach and the olecranon osteotomy approach exposed 0.8 ± 0.0 and 0.6 ± 0.0 of the distal humeral articular surface (P < .001), 1.0 ± 0.0 and 0.3 ± 0.1 of the capitellum (P < .001), 0.6 ± 0.0 and 0.7 ± 0.0 of the trochlea (P < .001), 0.7 ± 0.0 and 0.5 ± 0.1 of the anterior trochlea (P < .001), and 0.5 ± 0.0 and 1.0 ± 0.0 of the posterior trochlea, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the olecranon osteotomy approach, the lateral epicondyle osteotomy approach could more fully expose the total articular surface of the distal humerus, capitellum, and anterior trochlea, but the olecranon osteotomy approach could more fully expose the trochlea and posterior trochlea.