The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2025
Assessing Medical Student Attentional Bias in Unicoronal Craniosynostosis: An Eye-Tracking Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chan Ernest, Hong Paul, Bezuhly Michael
Аннотация
ObjectiveUsing a well-established measure of attention, we aimed to objectively identify medical students' gaze patterns when assessing children with/without unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) and identify potential diagnostic and educational gaps in their assessment.DesignMedical student participants viewed a series of images of children with/without UCS. Eye movements were recorded using a table-mounted eye-tracking device. Dwell times for 8 interest areas (forehead, brow, eyes, nose, lower face, mouth, left ear, right ear) were compared.ParticipantsThirty medical students (21 males, 9 females, mean age = 29.9 years old) were recruited from the local medical school.Main Outcome MeasureThe main outcome measure was the cumulative dwell times (milliseconds) participants spent within the 8 facial regions (forehead, brow, eyes, nose, lower face, mouth, left ear, right ear).ResultsParticipants spent significantly more time on the brow region (P < 0.001) and less on the nose region (P < 0.05) when viewing UCS images. Furthermore, there were significantly longer dwell times to the side of the forehead contralateral to the fused suture in UCS images (P < 0.05). In control images, participants focused more on the right side of the mouth (P < 0.05). No other significant differences in dwell times were observed.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that medical students exhibit attentional biases when viewing children with UCS and focus on only some of the asymmetries seen in UCS. These findings highlight potential educational gaps emphasizing the need for targeted training in craniofacial assessment.