DOI 10.1097/icl.0000000000001254
Improvement of Postoperative Visual Outcomes in Children With Primary Congenital Glaucoma.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the vision improvement of corneal rigid gas permeable contact lenses (RGPCLs) in children with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG), compared with spectacles.
METHODS
This cross-sectional analysis used baseline data from a randomized trial (CLEVR-PCG Study) investigating RGPCLs' impact on postoperative vision rehabilitation in children with PCG with controlled intraocular pressure from April 2022 to August 2023. The study included 51 eyes from 29 children aged 7.41±2.51 years. Refractive errors were corrected first with spectacles, then RGPCLs. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and best RGPCL-corrected visual acuity (BCLVA) and contrast sensitivity function (CSF) were compared.
RESULTS
BCLVA was better than BSCVA, and CSF with RGPCLs was better than with spectacles: BCLVA 0.30 (0.15, 0.52) LogMAR vs. BSCVA 0.40 (0.30, 0.70) LogMAR; area under the logarithm of the CSF (AULCSF) 0.68±0.38 vs. 0.51±0.33; CSF acuity 0.94±0.29 vs. 0.83±0.29 (all P <0.001). Multivariate linear regression showed greater myopic spherical equivalent (SER) associated with greater BCVA improvement (β=0.01, 95% CI: 0.004-0.02; P <0.001) and CSF acuity improvement (β=-0.01, 95% CI: -0.01 to -0.0005; P =0.036). Greater myopic SER (β=-0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to -0.004) and better BSCVA (β=-0.18, 95% CI: -0.32 to -0.04) associated with greater AULCSF improvement ( P =0.007).
CONCLUSION
RGPCLs immediately improved vision in children with PCG. These findings suggest that RGPCLs are potentially useful for visual rehabilitation in this population.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.