Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy With Long-Course Radiotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy in High-Risk Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (TNTCRT): A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Trial.
СтатьяКлиническое исследование III фазыМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Xin, Tang Yuanling, Lu Junyang, Meng Wenjian, Liu Ping, Zhou Jitao, Wen Feng, Ding Peirong, Li Jun, Wang Biao, Guo Qing, Qiu Jian, Sun Hao, Deng Xiangbing, Shen Yali, Zeng Hanjiang, Jiang Dan, Wang Di, Li Yunfeng, Xiao Yi, Wang Ziqiang
Аннотация
PURPOSE: High-risk locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) carries a substantial risk of distant recurrence, which limits disease-free survival (DFS). We compared total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) integrating long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) with uninterrupted doublet chemotherapy (doublet-LC TNT) versus conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).
METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, phase III trial, patients with stage II/III LARC and at least 1 high-risk feature (cT4a-b, cN2, mesorectal fascia involvement, or cT3c-d with extramural vascular invasion) were enrolled. Patients were assigned to doublet-LC TNT (induction, concurrent, and consolidation capecitabine plus oxaliplatin with LCRT) before surgery or nCRT (capecitabine with LCRT) followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary end point was DFS (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03177382).
RESULTS: Between June 6, 2017, and December 27, 2023, 458 patients were randomly assigned to doublet-LC TNT (n = 232) or nCRT (n = 226). At a median follow-up of 51 months, doublet-LC TNT improved 3-year DFS (74.8% v 66.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.674 [95% CI, 0.489 to 0.929]; P = .016). Metastasis-free survival (MFS; 77.7% v 67.6%; HR, 0.655 [95% CI, 0.469 to 0.915]) and pathologic complete response rates (pCR; 26.37% v 9.80%; P < .001) were higher with doublet-LC TNT, whereas locoregional failure remained low and comparable (6.03% v 6.19%; P = .943). Although grade ≥3 adverse events during the neoadjuvant phase were more frequent with doublet-LC TNT (27.59% v 8.56%; P < .001), severe toxicities during the entire treatment course (28.02% v 24.32%; P = .371) and major postoperative complications (3.98% v 2.94%; P = .567) were comparable.
CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional nCRT, doublet-LC TNT improved DFS, MFS, and pCR rates with manageable toxicity. These findings support this intensified, doublet-based regimen as a standard option within the modern TNT paradigm. Further comparative studies are warranted to evaluate these results against other short-course radiotherapy‑based or nondoublet-concurrent TNT regimens.
METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, phase III trial, patients with stage II/III LARC and at least 1 high-risk feature (cT4a-b, cN2, mesorectal fascia involvement, or cT3c-d with extramural vascular invasion) were enrolled. Patients were assigned to doublet-LC TNT (induction, concurrent, and consolidation capecitabine plus oxaliplatin with LCRT) before surgery or nCRT (capecitabine with LCRT) followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary end point was DFS (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03177382).
RESULTS: Between June 6, 2017, and December 27, 2023, 458 patients were randomly assigned to doublet-LC TNT (n = 232) or nCRT (n = 226). At a median follow-up of 51 months, doublet-LC TNT improved 3-year DFS (74.8% v 66.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.674 [95% CI, 0.489 to 0.929]; P = .016). Metastasis-free survival (MFS; 77.7% v 67.6%; HR, 0.655 [95% CI, 0.469 to 0.915]) and pathologic complete response rates (pCR; 26.37% v 9.80%; P < .001) were higher with doublet-LC TNT, whereas locoregional failure remained low and comparable (6.03% v 6.19%; P = .943). Although grade ≥3 adverse events during the neoadjuvant phase were more frequent with doublet-LC TNT (27.59% v 8.56%; P < .001), severe toxicities during the entire treatment course (28.02% v 24.32%; P = .371) and major postoperative complications (3.98% v 2.94%; P = .567) were comparable.
CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional nCRT, doublet-LC TNT improved DFS, MFS, and pCR rates with manageable toxicity. These findings support this intensified, doublet-based regimen as a standard option within the modern TNT paradigm. Further comparative studies are warranted to evaluate these results against other short-course radiotherapy‑based or nondoublet-concurrent TNT regimens.