BMC urology · 2024
Evaluation of Z-plasty versus Heineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty in the management of penoscrotal web in pediatric age group.
Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Elrouby Ahmed
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The penoscrotal web may be congenital or acquired following excessive ventral skin removal during circumcision. Several surgical techniques were described for the treatment of congenital webbed penis without a clear comparison between their outcomes. This prospective study aimed at comparing the surgical results of Z-scrotoplasty and Heineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty in the treatment of congenital webbed penis in uncircumcised pediatric patients.
METHODS: Our study included 40 uncircumcised patients who were divided randomly into two groups; Group A included 20 patients who were treated by Z-scrotoplasty and Group B included the other 20 patients who were treated by Heineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty. All patients were circumcised at the end of the procedure.
RESULTS: The surgical outcome was good without a significant difference between the two groups in 36 patients. Recurrent webbing developed in one patient of Group A and in three patients of Group B (FE p = 0.605) The only significant difference between the two groups was the operative duration which was shorter in Group B than in Group A (P < 0.001*).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of congenital penoscrotal web in the pediatric age group could be done with either Z-scrotoplasty or Heineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty with satisfactory results, however, without significant difference in the surgical outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: • Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05817760. • Registration release date: April 5, 2023.
METHODS: Our study included 40 uncircumcised patients who were divided randomly into two groups; Group A included 20 patients who were treated by Z-scrotoplasty and Group B included the other 20 patients who were treated by Heineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty. All patients were circumcised at the end of the procedure.
RESULTS: The surgical outcome was good without a significant difference between the two groups in 36 patients. Recurrent webbing developed in one patient of Group A and in three patients of Group B (FE p = 0.605) The only significant difference between the two groups was the operative duration which was shorter in Group B than in Group A (P < 0.001*).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of congenital penoscrotal web in the pediatric age group could be done with either Z-scrotoplasty or Heineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty with satisfactory results, however, without significant difference in the surgical outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: • Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05817760. • Registration release date: April 5, 2023.