International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2020
A task-shifted speech therapy program for cleft palate patients in rural Nepal: Evaluating impact and associated healthcare barriers.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lindeborg Michael M, Shakya Pramila, Pradhan Bhawani, Rai Shiba Kala, Gurung Kabita Bhattarai, Niroula Suman, Rayamajhi Badri, Chaudhary Hema, Gaire Bhagwati, Mahato Naina, Rana Lila, Rokaya Phana, Shrestha Nilam, Shrestha Renuka, Tamang Januka, Joshi Hemanta Dhoj, Gaha Pushpa, Khorja Dhana Kumari, Nakarmi Kiran K, Mitnick Carole D, Rai Shankar Man, Shaye David A
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Though access to surgical care for cleft lip/palate has expanded in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), post-palatoplasty speech therapy is often lacking due to limited healthcare infrastructure and personnel. This mixed-methods study seeks to: 1) evaluate the impact of task-shifted speech therapy on a standardized speech score; 2) describe the experiences of families with post-operative cleft care and associated barriers; and 3) understand how to optimize cleft care by exploring the experiences of children who had nominal improvements after task-shifted speech therapy.
METHODS: A convergent parallel mixed-methods study was conducted in Nepal. Standardized speech scores were compared by a blinded speech-language pathologist before and after the speech intervention. Semi-structured interviews (SSIs) and focus groups with families evaluated cleft care experiences and barriers. Qualitative and quantitative data were merged and analyzed.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine post-palatoplasty children with speech deficits (ages 3-18) underwent task-shifted speech therapy, and demonstrated significant improvements in composite speech scores targeted by exercises (p<0.0001) and weakness (p=0.0002), with improvements in misarticulation (p=0.07) and glottal stop (p=0.05) that trended towards significance. Forty-seven SSIs demonstrated that the greatest barriers to follow-up were family responsibilities (62%), travel/distance (53%), and work (34%). In five focus groups, families expressed a desire to improve their child's speech and seek formal speech therapy. The speech intervention was found to be beneficial because of the compassionate staff, free lodging/food, and ability to socialize with other cleft patients and families. After merging quantitative and qualitative data, we noted that younger children between 3 and 5 years old and families who traveled greater distances for healthcare access benefited less from the speech therapy intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Task-shifted speech therapy has the potential to improve cleft lip/palate speech in LMICs. Multiple biosocial issues limit access to appropriate post-operative care.
METHODS: A convergent parallel mixed-methods study was conducted in Nepal. Standardized speech scores were compared by a blinded speech-language pathologist before and after the speech intervention. Semi-structured interviews (SSIs) and focus groups with families evaluated cleft care experiences and barriers. Qualitative and quantitative data were merged and analyzed.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine post-palatoplasty children with speech deficits (ages 3-18) underwent task-shifted speech therapy, and demonstrated significant improvements in composite speech scores targeted by exercises (p<0.0001) and weakness (p=0.0002), with improvements in misarticulation (p=0.07) and glottal stop (p=0.05) that trended towards significance. Forty-seven SSIs demonstrated that the greatest barriers to follow-up were family responsibilities (62%), travel/distance (53%), and work (34%). In five focus groups, families expressed a desire to improve their child's speech and seek formal speech therapy. The speech intervention was found to be beneficial because of the compassionate staff, free lodging/food, and ability to socialize with other cleft patients and families. After merging quantitative and qualitative data, we noted that younger children between 3 and 5 years old and families who traveled greater distances for healthcare access benefited less from the speech therapy intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Task-shifted speech therapy has the potential to improve cleft lip/palate speech in LMICs. Multiple biosocial issues limit access to appropriate post-operative care.