DOI 10.1007/s13239-022-00648-w
An In Vitro Circulatory Loop Model of the Pediatric Right Ventricular Outflow Tract as a Platform for Valve Evaluation.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Tetralogy of Fallot and other conditions affecting the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) are common in pediatric patients, but there is a lack of quantitative comparison among techniques for repairing or replacing the pulmonary valve. The aim of this study was to develop a robust in vitro system for quantifying flow conditions after various RVOT interventions.
METHODS
An infant-sized mock circulatory loop that includes a 3D-printed RVOT anatomical model was developed to evaluate flow conditions after different simulated surgical repairs. Physiologically correct flow and pressure were achieved with custom compliant tubing and a tunable flow restrictor. Pressure gradient, flow regurgitation, and coaptation height were measured for two monocusp leaflet designs after tuning the system with a 12 mm Hancock valved conduit.
RESULTS
Measurements were repeatable across multiple samples of two different monocusp designs, with the wider leaflet in the 50% backwall model consistently exhibiting lower pressure gradient but higher regurgitation compared to the leaflet in the 40% backwall model. Coaptation height was measured via direct visualization with endoscopic cameras, revealing a shorter area of contact for the wider leaflet (3.3-4.0 mm) compared to the narrower one (4.3 mm).
CONCLUSION
The 3D-printed RVOT anatomical model and in vitro pulmonary circulatory loop developed in this work provide a platform for planning and evaluating surgical interventions in the pediatric population. Measurements of regurgitation, pressure gradient, and coaptation provide a quantitative basis for comparison among different valve designs and positions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.