Comparison of the efficacy of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle approach vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar vertebral compression fractures: A retrospective cohort study.

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are prevalent among the elderly and significantly impact quality of life. Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) offers effective, minimally invasive treatment. However, the choice between unilateral and bilateral transpedicular approaches remains debated due to differing surgical outcomes and complication risks. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle approaches in PKP for osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures. A retrospective study was conducted at Xi'an People's Hospital (Xi'an Fourth Hospital), including 136 patients with single-level OVCFs (T11-L2) treated with PKP between January 2021 and January 2023. Patients were grouped based on surgical approach: unilateral (n = 79) or bilateral (n = 57) pedicle puncture. Primary intraoperative outcomes included operative time, blood loss, fluoroscopic exposures, and cement volume. Secondary outcomes assessed pain relief (visual analog scale), functional recovery (activities of daily living), radiographic parameters (cement distribution, kyphotic angle, vertebral height), and complications. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The bilateral group had longer operative time (51.40 ± 12.99 minutes vs 45.62 ± 14.96 minutes, P < .05), more blood loss (15.89 ± 7.20 mL vs 9.95 ± 4.71 mL, P < .01), increased X-ray exposure (22.44 ± 6.15 vs 17.63 ± 6.28, P < .01), and greater cement volume (5.37 ± 1.64 mL vs 3.86 ± 1.41 mL, P < .01). Cement distribution was more extensive in the bilateral group (vertical fill height P < .05; horizontal fill width P < .01). Despite these differences, both groups experienced comparable pain relief and functional improvement (visual analog scale and activities of daily living scores, all P > .05). Kyphotic angle correction, vertebral height restoration, and complication rates (10.1% vs 8.8%, P = .50) were also comparable between the 2 groups. No cases of symptomatic cement embolism or neurological deficits were observed. Both unilateral and bilateral PKP approaches offer effective pain relief, functional recovery, and safety in treating thoracolumbar OVCFs. Although the bilateral approach achieved more symmetrical cement distribution, it required greater intraoperative resources without superior clinical outcomes. Approach selection should be individualized based on patient anatomy, fracture characteristics, and surgeon experience.