Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2024
Computer-vision analysis of craniofacial dysmorphology in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and psychosis spectrum disorders.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roalf David R, McDonald-McGinn Donna M, Jee Joelle, Krall Mckenna, Crowley T Blaine, Moberg Paul J, Kohler Christian, Calkins Monica E, Crow Andrew J D, Fleischer Nicole, Gallagher R Sean, Gonzenbach Virgilio, Clark Kelly, Gur Ruben C, McClellan Emily, McGinn Daniel E, Mordy Arianna, Ruparel Kosha, Turetsky Bruce I, Shinohara Russell T, White Lauren, Zackai Elaine, Gur Raquel E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Minor physical anomalies (MPAs) are congenital morphological abnormalities linked to disruptions of fetal development. MPAs are common in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) and psychosis spectrum disorders (PS) and likely represent a disruption of early embryologic development that may help identify overlapping mechanisms linked to psychosis in these disorders.
METHODS: Here, 2D digital photographs were collected from 22q11DS (n = 150), PS (n = 55), and typically developing (TD; n = 93) individuals. Photographs were analyzed using two computer-vision techniques: (1) DeepGestalt algorithm (Face2Gene (F2G)) technology to identify the presence of genetically mediated facial disorders, and (2) Emotrics-a semi-automated machine learning technique that localizes and measures facial features.
RESULTS: F2G reliably identified patients with 22q11DS; faces of PS patients were matched to several genetic conditions including FragileX and 22q11DS. PCA-derived factor loadings of all F2G scores indicated unique and overlapping facial patterns that were related to both 22q11DS and PS. Regional facial measurements of the eyes and nose were smaller in 22q11DS as compared to TD, while PS showed intermediate measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: The extent to which craniofacial dysmorphology 22q11DS and PS overlapping and evident before the impairment or distress of sub-psychotic symptoms may allow us to identify at-risk youths more reliably and at an earlier stage of development.
METHODS: Here, 2D digital photographs were collected from 22q11DS (n = 150), PS (n = 55), and typically developing (TD; n = 93) individuals. Photographs were analyzed using two computer-vision techniques: (1) DeepGestalt algorithm (Face2Gene (F2G)) technology to identify the presence of genetically mediated facial disorders, and (2) Emotrics-a semi-automated machine learning technique that localizes and measures facial features.
RESULTS: F2G reliably identified patients with 22q11DS; faces of PS patients were matched to several genetic conditions including FragileX and 22q11DS. PCA-derived factor loadings of all F2G scores indicated unique and overlapping facial patterns that were related to both 22q11DS and PS. Regional facial measurements of the eyes and nose were smaller in 22q11DS as compared to TD, while PS showed intermediate measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: The extent to which craniofacial dysmorphology 22q11DS and PS overlapping and evident before the impairment or distress of sub-psychotic symptoms may allow us to identify at-risk youths more reliably and at an earlier stage of development.