DOI 10.1097/sap.0000000000002899
Prominent Ear Correction Using Full-Thickness Cartilage Strip: An Incomplete Cutting Technique.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Prominent ears are one of the most well-known facial disfigurements influencing youngsters. Approximately 5% of the population suffers from some degree of ear prominence. More than 200 techniques have been used for the surgical correction of prominent ears, referring that no single "best" method exists and that techniques and modifications will continue to appear.
OBJECTIVES
In this work, we are going to evaluate the results of using a full-thickness cartilage strip, an incomplete cutting technique for the correction of various degrees of the prominent ear.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
This prospective controlled clinical trial was carried out on a sum of 63 patients, who presented with prominent ear deformity, in the period between March 2014 and January 2020 at the plastic and reconstructive surgery department, Tanta University Hospitals, and private clinic.
RESULTS
Sixty-three patients were operated upon, 46 were males and 17 were females, their age ranged between 4 and 23 years, and their mean age was 9.7 years. Clinical results showed excellent results in 37 patients (58.7%), good results in 18 patients (28. 6%), fair results in 8 patients (12.7%), and no poor results. Patient satisfaction showed excellent results in 32 patients (50.8%), good results in 22 patients (34.9%), fair results in 9 patients (14.3%), and no poor results.
CONCLUSIONS
Prominent ear correction using full-thickness cartilage strip, an incomplete cutting technique, is a good technique. It can be used in the correction of different varieties of prominent ears. It has a very low incidence of complications. No hypertrophic or keloidal scars have been reported.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.