Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Foot and Ankle Fractures in a Freestanding Ambulatory Surgery Center is a Safe, Cost-effective Alternative to a Hospital.

BACKGROUND

In the United States, the number of pediatric fractures treated in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) continues to increase. Few studies have compared the outcomes and complications of treating these injuries in a freestanding ASC versus in a hospital setting. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes, treatment times, and costs for treatment of pediatric foot and ankle fractures in the ASC and hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified pediatric patients with isolated, closed, and acute (below 3 wk) distal tibia, ankle, or foot fractures who underwent closed reduction in an operating room or operative fixation between January 2015 and December 2019. The patients were divided into 2 groups: ASC and hospital. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, mechanism of injury, surgical time, facility time, costs for treatment, and complications. Preoperative and postoperative alignment was assessed on radiographs. Clinical outcomes included pain, weight-bearing, or deformity at final follow-up. Multivariable generalized linear models and logistic regression were used to determine the association between surgical setting and treatment outcomes, times, and costs.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-three patients were identified; 115 treated in the ASC and 108 treated in the hospital. Adjusted for age at treatment, injury type, procedure performed, and preoperative alignment, there were no differences in surgical time, clinical or radiographic outcomes, or complications between groups. The mean total operating room time, total facility time, and total charges were significantly lower in patients treated in the ASC than in the hospital.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric distal tibia, ankle, and foot fractures can be safely treated in an ASC with equivalent outcomes and complications compared with those in a hospital setting. Benefits include shorter total surgical and facility times as well as decreased cost of care. These findings could allow for patients to receive more timely and efficient treatment with less financial burden.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.