Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
Reduced Fascial Dehiscence with Combined Small-and-Large Technique Compared to Small-Bite Technique in Emergency Midline Laparotomy: A Retrospective Study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koca Faruk, Sliwinski Svenja, Uttinger Konstantin, Petrova Ekaterina, Matthes Niels, Wiegering Armin, Benkö Tamás
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the rates of fascial dehiscence after fascial closure using the combined small-and-large technique versus the small-bite technique following emergency laparotomy.
METHODS: A retrospective, single-center, observational study was conducted. All patients who underwent emergency midline laparotomy at the University Hospital Frankfurt in from 2022 till 2024 with either small-bite technique were included or combined small-and-large technique, which involves periodic internal reinforcement sutures. Propensity score matching was performed based on preoperative predictors of fascial dehiscence. The rate of fascial dehiscence was compared between the matched groups.
RESULTS: A total of 294 patients were included. The combined small-and-large technique was used for fascial closure in 37 cases (12.6%), while the small-bite technique was used in 257 cases (87.5%). In descriptive statistics, fascial dehiscence was observed in 31 cases (10.5%); two cases (5.4%) in the group with combined small-and-large technique and 29 cases (11.3%) in the group with small-bite technique. After perfoming propensity score matching 29 cases were matched in each group, with one case of fascial dehiscence in the combined small-and-large technique versus 5 cases the small-bite technique group. However, there was no statistically significant difference.
CONCLUSION: A lower rate of fascial dehiscence may be achieved using the combined small-and-large technique following emergency laparotomy compared to the small-bite technique.
METHODS: A retrospective, single-center, observational study was conducted. All patients who underwent emergency midline laparotomy at the University Hospital Frankfurt in from 2022 till 2024 with either small-bite technique were included or combined small-and-large technique, which involves periodic internal reinforcement sutures. Propensity score matching was performed based on preoperative predictors of fascial dehiscence. The rate of fascial dehiscence was compared between the matched groups.
RESULTS: A total of 294 patients were included. The combined small-and-large technique was used for fascial closure in 37 cases (12.6%), while the small-bite technique was used in 257 cases (87.5%). In descriptive statistics, fascial dehiscence was observed in 31 cases (10.5%); two cases (5.4%) in the group with combined small-and-large technique and 29 cases (11.3%) in the group with small-bite technique. After perfoming propensity score matching 29 cases were matched in each group, with one case of fascial dehiscence in the combined small-and-large technique versus 5 cases the small-bite technique group. However, there was no statistically significant difference.
CONCLUSION: A lower rate of fascial dehiscence may be achieved using the combined small-and-large technique following emergency laparotomy compared to the small-bite technique.