MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4314/ahs.v23i4.41

Медицинская библиотека · African health sciences · 2023

Maxillofacial trauma and cerebrospinal fluid leak: a retrospective clinical study.

Anyanechi Charles E, Saheeb Birch D

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of maxillofacial fractures associated with persistent CSF leak, and to assess its bearing on clinical outcomes of consecutive patients managed at our centre.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. The medical records of patients over 11-year period were analysed for age, gender, etiology of injuries, duration between injury and presentation to the hospital, types of facial fracture and their treatments, treatment done to control CSF leak, and complication(s). Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed.

RESULTS

Overall, 1473 patients were evaluated, 66 (4.5%) presented with craniofacial injuries associated with persistent CSF leak after 5 days of non-surgical treatment. Males (92.5%, P= 0.0000) and those in the 21 to 30 years age group (59.1 %, P=0.01) were predominant. The most common (68.2%) type of fracture combination was Le Fort I, II and III, NOE, zygomatic complex and mandible. The commonest clinical presentation of CSF leak was rhinorrhea only, in 66.7% of patients (P= 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the prevalence of maxillofacial fractures associated with persistent CSF leak was low, which was 4.5% of patients that presented with persistent CSF leak and 84.9% of the cases resolved after treatment of the various maxillofacial fractures.

Для цитирования: Anyanechi Charles E, Saheeb Birch D. Maxillofacial trauma and cerebrospinal fluid leak: a retrospective clinical study.. African health sciences. 2023. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v23i4.41.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.