Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2013
Alphasphere as a successful ocular implant in primary enucleation and secondary orbital implant exchange.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shevchenko Liliya, Boss Joseph, Shah Christopher T, Droste Patrick J, Hassan Adam S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To describe the surgical technique for a novel poly-HEMA (2-hydroxyethyl methacralate)[PHEMA] implant (Alphasphere, Addition Technology, Des Plaines, IL) in primary enucleation and placement of secondary orbital implant.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all patients receiving an Alphasphere implant for primary enucleation or secondary implant exchange from October 2009 to 2011. Interval follow-up was performed again on January 2013. Patient demographics, indications for surgery, and post-operative complications were reviewed.
RESULTS: Twelve patients received an Alphasphere implant for primary enucleation (n = 10) or secondary exchange (n = 2), with follow-up that ranged from 2 weeks to 14 months. The study included 9 adult and 3 pediatric patients with a mean age of 40 years, range 8-82 years. The indication for enucleation included: painful blind eye (n = 9), enophthalmos with difficult prosthesis fit in cases of secondary implant exchange (n = 2), and prophylaxis for sympathetic ophthalmia (n = 1). Only one patient required removal of the implant, due to a sinus infection with subsequent extrusion of the implant. Otherwise, the only other complication experienced was slight implant migration (n = 1).
CONCLUSION: This initial report indicates that Alphasphere can be successfully used in the management of an anophthalmic socket. The advantages of the Alphasphere implant include: it does not require tissue wrapping, extraocular muscles can be directly sutured to the implant, it maintains a smooth surface to limit risk of exposure due to conjunctival breakdown, and undergoes anterior orbital fibrovascular ingrowth which optimizes prosthesis location and socket motility.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all patients receiving an Alphasphere implant for primary enucleation or secondary implant exchange from October 2009 to 2011. Interval follow-up was performed again on January 2013. Patient demographics, indications for surgery, and post-operative complications were reviewed.
RESULTS: Twelve patients received an Alphasphere implant for primary enucleation (n = 10) or secondary exchange (n = 2), with follow-up that ranged from 2 weeks to 14 months. The study included 9 adult and 3 pediatric patients with a mean age of 40 years, range 8-82 years. The indication for enucleation included: painful blind eye (n = 9), enophthalmos with difficult prosthesis fit in cases of secondary implant exchange (n = 2), and prophylaxis for sympathetic ophthalmia (n = 1). Only one patient required removal of the implant, due to a sinus infection with subsequent extrusion of the implant. Otherwise, the only other complication experienced was slight implant migration (n = 1).
CONCLUSION: This initial report indicates that Alphasphere can be successfully used in the management of an anophthalmic socket. The advantages of the Alphasphere implant include: it does not require tissue wrapping, extraocular muscles can be directly sutured to the implant, it maintains a smooth surface to limit risk of exposure due to conjunctival breakdown, and undergoes anterior orbital fibrovascular ingrowth which optimizes prosthesis location and socket motility.