The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 1999
Atrioventricular discordance: results of repair in 127 patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yeh T, Connelly M S, Coles J G, Webb G D, McLaughlin P R, Freedom R M, Cerrito P B, Williams W G
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The conventional management of patients with atrioventricular discordance is directed at associated lesions, taking advantage of physiologic "correction"; however, the morphologic right ventricle and tricuspid valve support the systemic circulation. Questions surrounding survival using this approach led us to analyze our institutional results.
METHODS: All patients with atrioventricular discordance undergoing biventricular repair were analyzed (n = 127, 1959-1997), excluding those with functionally univentricular hearts. The ventriculoarterial connection associated with atrioventricular discordance varied and was most commonly discordant (87%), but occasionally concordant (6%), double-outlet right ventricle (6%), or double-outlet left ventricle (1%). At initial presentation, the most common lesions associated with atrioventricular discordance were ventricular septal defect (86%), pulmonary stenosis (64%), tricuspid regurgitation (28%), and atrioventricular block (12%). Nine patients underwent a double switch procedure to create ventriculoarterial concordance and the remainder were managed conventionally without correcting discordant connections.
RESULTS: Operative mortality was 6% and did not vary by associated lesion. Twenty years after repair, survival was 48%. Within 20 years, 56% of patients required reoperation, usually for atrioventricular valve incompetence (n = 16), pulmonary stenosis (n = 16), or both (n = 3). Pacemakers were required in 50 patients, 4 before repair, 40 within 2 months of repair, and 6 remotely after repair. In early follow-up, the double switch procedure (n = 9) had equivalent mortality and a high pacemaker requirement for atrioventricular block.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of conventional management of atrioventricular discordance revealed cumulative increases in mortality, systemic atrioventricular valve (tricuspid) replacement, complete atrioventricular block, and incidence of reoperation. Alternative management should be examined.
METHODS: All patients with atrioventricular discordance undergoing biventricular repair were analyzed (n = 127, 1959-1997), excluding those with functionally univentricular hearts. The ventriculoarterial connection associated with atrioventricular discordance varied and was most commonly discordant (87%), but occasionally concordant (6%), double-outlet right ventricle (6%), or double-outlet left ventricle (1%). At initial presentation, the most common lesions associated with atrioventricular discordance were ventricular septal defect (86%), pulmonary stenosis (64%), tricuspid regurgitation (28%), and atrioventricular block (12%). Nine patients underwent a double switch procedure to create ventriculoarterial concordance and the remainder were managed conventionally without correcting discordant connections.
RESULTS: Operative mortality was 6% and did not vary by associated lesion. Twenty years after repair, survival was 48%. Within 20 years, 56% of patients required reoperation, usually for atrioventricular valve incompetence (n = 16), pulmonary stenosis (n = 16), or both (n = 3). Pacemakers were required in 50 patients, 4 before repair, 40 within 2 months of repair, and 6 remotely after repair. In early follow-up, the double switch procedure (n = 9) had equivalent mortality and a high pacemaker requirement for atrioventricular block.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of conventional management of atrioventricular discordance revealed cumulative increases in mortality, systemic atrioventricular valve (tricuspid) replacement, complete atrioventricular block, and incidence of reoperation. Alternative management should be examined.