MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jpc.70204

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025

Degree of Agreement Between Different Classification Systems for Severity Levels of Positional Plagiocephaly.

Siegle Cristhina Bonilha Huster, Matarazzo Carolina Gomes

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To assess the agreement between severity level classifications of plagiocephaly using measurement of the difference between transcranial diagonals (DTD) and the Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAi), based on different references found in the literature.

METHOD: Observational study conducted with 50 babies with a possible diagnosis of plagiocephaly. Diagnosis and cranial measurements were obtained through 3D cranial scanning. The cranial measurements selected for the study were DTD (in cm) and CVAi (in %), which determined, according to different classification systems, the severity level of the asymmetry as absent, mild, moderate, or severe. Three different classification references using DTD and four using CVAi were applied to determine severity, and agreement between classifications were analyzed using the κ index.

RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION: Agreement between the classifications using DTD and CVAi measurements ranged from weak to moderate across all references found in the literature. All analyses were statistically significant. Findings suggest that there may be conflicts and discrepancies in classifying the deformity as mild, moderate, or severe, which can lead to different clinical treatment decisions.

Для цитирования: Siegle Cristhina Bonilha Huster, Matarazzo Carolina Gomes. Degree of Agreement Between Different Classification Systems for Severity Levels of Positional Plagiocephaly.. Journal of paediatrics and child health. 2025. DOI: 10.1111/jpc.70204.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.