MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00383-018-4399-x

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric surgery international · 2018

Tethered cord in children with anorectal malformations with emphasis on rectobladder neck fistula.

Samuk I, Bischoff A, Freud E, Pena A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To find the incidence of tethered cord (TC) in patients with anorectal malformations (ARM) and to determine the relationship between bowel/urinary control and TC in a subset of patients with rectobladder neck fistula (RBNF).

METHODS

The database of a tertiary medical center was retrospectively collected for all patients treated for ARM from 1980 to 2012. All patients with TC and RBNF were identified.

RESULTS

Among 790 patients, who underwent screening for TC, 285(36%) were diagnosed with TC. Eleven of 37 screened patients with RBNF were diagnosed with TC. The median follow-up period was 49 months (range 2-222 months). TC was diagnosed in 3/18(16.6%) patients with sacral ratio (SR) ≥ 0.7; 4/12(33.3%) with SR 0.41-0.69; and 4/7(57.1%) patients with SR 0-0.4. The association of TC in RBNF patients had a negative influence in the prognosis for bowel and urinary control.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of TC among patients with ARM is 36%. Incidence of TC among patients with RBNF correlates with SR value and is higher with lower SR. Patients with RBNF and TC have dismal prognosis for bowel control, unrelated to their SR status. Many unresolved questions related to the management of ARM patients with asymptomatic TC still remain.

Для цитирования: Samuk I, Bischoff A, Freud E, Pena A. Tethered cord in children with anorectal malformations with emphasis on rectobladder neck fistula.. Pediatric surgery international. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-018-4399-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.