MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.otorri.2016.01.008

Медицинская библиотека · Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola · 2016

Cicatricial posterior glottic stenosis. Our experience.

Maeso-Plaza Ana, Dablanca-Blanco María, Ortega-Fernandez Consuelo, Ortega-Del Álamo Primitivo

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION AND

OBJECTIVES

Presentation of the results obtained in the treatment of cicatricial posterior glottic stenosis.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 34 patients diagnosed and treated for cicatricial posterior glottic stenosis in our ENT Department.

RESULTS

In our series, 85.36% of our patients were decannulated. Of these, 80% of the patients with glottic stenosis were decannulated, while 92.9% of the patients with other associated laryngotracheal stenosis were paradoxically decannulated. Of all the patients, 70% required more than 1 surgical procedure, although most of these interventions were to resolve minor issues following our protocol. The number of subsequent interventions was determined by the location of the stenosis, with there being more interventions when the posterior glottic stenosis was associated with another type of laryngotracheal stenosis (p=.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical results for treating cicatricial posterior glottic stenosis are quite positive. However, unlike other types of posterior glottic stenosis (such as neurogenic abductor paralysis), it requires a greater number of interventions to achieve definitive decannulation. Endoscopic procedures play an important role and represent our main tool.

Для цитирования: Maeso-Plaza Ana, Dablanca-Blanco María, Ortega-Fernandez Consuelo, Ortega-Del Álamo Primitivo. Cicatricial posterior glottic stenosis. Our experience.. Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.otorri.2016.01.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.