MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpag.2013.05.001

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2013

Adolescent urethral coitus: 2 cases and review of the literature.

Ryckman Julie, Black Amanda, Fleming Nathalie

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Urethral coitus is a very rare finding in adolescent women. There are 26 reported cases in the literature, but only two were in adolescents. Urethral coitus has been most commonly described in women with müllerian anomalies and less commonly in other unusual clinical circumstances.

CASES: We report 2 cases of adolescent women with known müllerian anomalies who were unknowingly engaging in urethral coitus; 1 adolescent with known vaginal agenesis and VACTERL association and one 16-year-old with an oblique vaginal septum and non-communicating functioning uterine horn. Both young women had significant urethral dilation at the time of examination under anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Urethral intercourse is rare but may have significant consequences. Ongoing follow-up, careful history, and physical examination in adolescent women with müllerian anomalies are important in order to avoid possible complications, particularly when they are contemplating sexual activity. A history of urinary incontinence, dyspareunia, and urinary tract infections in young women with müllerian anomalies should raise suspicion of urethral coitus. If possible, the müllerian anomaly should be corrected to allow vaginal intercourse and discontinuation of urethral coitus.

Для цитирования: Ryckman Julie, Black Amanda, Fleming Nathalie. Adolescent urethral coitus: 2 cases and review of the literature.. Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2013.05.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.