MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/19458924261437216

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Simultaneous Bilateral Nasal Cauterization in Pediatric Recurrent Anterior Epistaxis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lou Zhengcai, Yang Hailing, Zhao Chaowei, Jin Kanfeng, Sun Junzhi, Liu Mengyun, Lv Tian, Li Weiwei

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

ObjectiveWe compared the efficacy and safety of simultaneous bilateral silver nitrate cautery (SNC), bipolar electrocautery (BEC), and radiofrequency coagulation (RFC) for the treatment of pediatric bilateral recurrent anterior epistaxis (RAE).Materials and MethodsChildren with bilateral RAE were prospectively randomized to receive SNC (n = 40), BEC (n = 40), or RFC (n = 40). The primary outcome measures were successful hemostasis and re-bleeding at 4 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the requirement for postoperative analgesia, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and procedure-related complications.ResultsIn total, 212 nostrils of 106 patients were analyzed. The rates of successful hemostasis were 73.4%, 85.9%, and 97.1% in the SNC, BEC, and RFC groups, respectively (P < .01). At 4 weeks, the re-bleeding rates were 45.3%, 19.2%, and 2.9% in the SNC, BEC, and RFC groups, respectively (P < .01). At 6 months, re-bleeding occurred in 59.4% of SNC patients, 11.5% of BEC patients, and 0% of RFC patients (P < .001). At 12 months, the re-bleeding rates were 70.3%, 5.1%, and 0.0% in the SNC, BEC, and RFC groups, respectively (P < .001). Significant differences were observed in VAS scores for nasal crusting across the three groups at all follow-up points; however, no significant difference was detected between SNC and RFC. In contrast, septal perforation was observed in 5.1% of BEC patients, with mucosal necrosis in 6.4% of treated nostrils. In the RFC group, septal perforation developed in 2.9% of patients.ConclusionRFC demonstrated higher hemostatic success and lower recurrence of epistaxis compared with SNC and BEC in the treatment of bilateral RAE, while bilateral cross-cauterization with RFC should still be used with caution given the incidence of septal perforation. Additionally, stepwise cauterization with BEC (treating each side after healing of the opposite side) should be considered when managing pediatric bilateral RAE.

Для цитирования: Lou Zhengcai, Yang Hailing, Zhao Chaowei, Jin Kanfeng, Sun Junzhi, Liu Mengyun, Lv Tian, Li Weiwei. Efficacy and Safety of Simultaneous Bilateral Nasal Cauterization in Pediatric Recurrent Anterior Epistaxis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.. American journal of rhinology & allergy. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/19458924261437216.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.