MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000006898

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of surgery · 2025

The Efficacy and Safety of Intrapancreatic Bile Duct Resection Applied in Type I of Congenital Bile Duct Dilation: A Multicenter Control Cohort Study.

Yang Chang-Zhen, Zhu Cheng-Zhan, Chen Zhi-Yu, Jiang Nan, Wang Si-Yuan, Wang Yu-Jie, Liu Zhi-Peng, Lv Guo-Yue, Wang Guang-Yi, Fan Zhong-Qi, Sun Xiao-Dong, Zhao Zhi-Hao, Hu Xu-Tao, Lu Hong-Wei, Shang Hao, Lu Yu-Xuan, Lin Yu-Jia, Zhou Hu, Zhang Tao, Shan Si-Qiao, Lin Ming-Yu, Yang Dong-Liang, Sun Kai, Xiang Can-Hong, Zeng Jian-Ping, Jin Shuo, Dong Jia-Hong

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of radical extrahepatic cyst excision (REC), which includes the intrapancreatic bile duct (IPBD), and subtotal extrahepatic cyst excision (SEC), which preserves the IPBD, in treating Todani type I congenital bile duct dilation with IPBD involvement (I-IPBD).

BACKGROUND

The application of REC and SEC in I-IPBD remains debated.

METHODS

The multicenter study recruited I-IPBDs who underwent REC or SEC from 5 centers between 2006 and 2024. The primary endpoint was occurrence of long-term complications, including recurrent cholangitis, pancreatitis, and IPBD stones. The secondary outcomes included readmission, reoperation, life quality assessed by Mayo score, carcinogenesis, and perioperative complications categorized as overall, severe, pancreas-related, and severe pancreas-related.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-five I-IPBDs were included and divided into the REC group (175 cases) and SEC (180 cases) from 722 type I congenital bile duct dilations. The REC group demonstrated better long-term complication-free survival compared with SEC group (log-rank P < 0.001; hazard ratio = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04-0.15, P < 0.001). The REC group had lower rates of readmission, reoperation, and carcinogenesis, and achieved a superior Mayo score ( P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the REC and SEC groups in overall perioperative complications, severe perioperative complications, and severe pancreas-related perioperative complications ( P > 0.05). Furthermore, subgroup analysis by age demonstrated similar trends in primary and secondary outcomes compared with the overall analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

REC was an effective and safe surgical approach for I-IPBD compared with SEC, thus it should be recommended routinely for these patients.

Для цитирования: Yang Chang-Zhen, Zhu Cheng-Zhan, Chen Zhi-Yu, Jiang Nan, Wang Si-Yuan, Wang Yu-Jie, Liu Zhi-Peng, Lv Guo-Yue, Wang Guang-Yi, Fan Zhong-Qi, Sun Xiao-Dong, Zhao Zhi-Hao, Hu Xu-Tao, Lu Hong-Wei, Shang Hao, Lu Yu-Xuan, Lin Yu-Jia, Zhou Hu, Zhang Tao, Shan Si-Qiao, Lin Ming-Yu, Yang Dong-Liang, Sun Kai, Xiang Can-Hong, Zeng Jian-Ping, Jin Shuo, Dong Jia-Hong. The Efficacy and Safety of Intrapancreatic Bile Duct Resection Applied in Type I of Congenital Bile Duct Dilation: A Multicenter Control Cohort Study.. Annals of surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006898.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.