Journal of pediatric urology · 2020
Prune perineum surgical correction - Treatment of a rare syndrome.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Berjeaut Ricardo Haidar, Cezarino Bruno Nicolino, Lopes Roberto Iglesias, Dénes Francisco Tibor
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Prune Perineum Syndrome (PPS) is rare, with only three cases described in the literature. Treatment requires abdominal and pelvic surgeries. Our goal is to provide a video with steps of the surgical corrections of this syndrome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a case of an 8 months-old boy with PPS. At our first evaluation, he had already been submitted to a colostomy with mucous fistula and a vesicostomy.
RESULTS: By the time of this publication, he had been submitted to six surgical procedures. First, osteotomy, followed by colostomy, cystoscopic evaluation, cystoplasty, perineal and abdominal correction with a dual mesh, bilateral orchidopexy, treatment of the vesicocolonic fistula, sigmoidectomy and appendicectomy. He is 6 years old, walks with no assistance, has satisfactory abdominal tonus which allows him to void with Valsalva Maneuver. Clean intermittent catheterization is also performed. He had no UTI since his first surgery. Although submitted to several procedures, treatment is not yet concluded. A future urethral dilation together with a genitoplasty might improve his quality of life.
CONCLUSION: PPS is a very rare condition, with scarce literature concerning its treatment. Multiple procedures might be necessary to correct malformations and improve patient's quality of life.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a case of an 8 months-old boy with PPS. At our first evaluation, he had already been submitted to a colostomy with mucous fistula and a vesicostomy.
RESULTS: By the time of this publication, he had been submitted to six surgical procedures. First, osteotomy, followed by colostomy, cystoscopic evaluation, cystoplasty, perineal and abdominal correction with a dual mesh, bilateral orchidopexy, treatment of the vesicocolonic fistula, sigmoidectomy and appendicectomy. He is 6 years old, walks with no assistance, has satisfactory abdominal tonus which allows him to void with Valsalva Maneuver. Clean intermittent catheterization is also performed. He had no UTI since his first surgery. Although submitted to several procedures, treatment is not yet concluded. A future urethral dilation together with a genitoplasty might improve his quality of life.
CONCLUSION: PPS is a very rare condition, with scarce literature concerning its treatment. Multiple procedures might be necessary to correct malformations and improve patient's quality of life.