MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00006565-200010000-00005

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric emergency care · 2000

Preliminary experience with 2-octylcyanoacrylate in a pediatric emergency department.

Resch K L, Hick J L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Documentation of use of octylcyanoacrylate adhesives in a pediatric emergency department with reference to patient selection, complications, and parent satisfaction.

DESIGN

Retrospective and concurrent chart review of the first 100 patients on which 2-octylcyanoacrylate (2-OCA, Dermabonda) was used in a pediatric emergency department. Additional telephone follow-up was performed for each patient.

RESULTS

The average patient age was 4.7 years, average laceration size 1.2 cm. Sixteen percent of wounds were repaired with 2-OCA. Three immediate complications involved a minor dehiscence and two eyelid adhesions. Two wound infections and a patient with hematoma and keloid formation were identified as later complications. The vast majority of parents preferred tissue adhesive repair to sutures. Time in department was reduced from 106 minutes to 69 minutes on average (P < 0.0001, CI 26-52).

CONCLUSIONS

Octylcyanoacrylate adhesives performed well in the daily practice of a pediatric emergency department, and were used for a significant percentage of laceration closures. Convenience, average infection rates, and good parental satisfaction make tissue adhesives a valuable addition to our wound closure techniques. Certain pitfalls occurring during early experience with these adhesives can be recognized and avoided.

Для цитирования: Resch K L, Hick J L. Preliminary experience with 2-octylcyanoacrylate in a pediatric emergency department.. Pediatric emergency care. 2000. DOI: 10.1097/00006565-200010000-00005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.