MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/lary.21579

Медицинская библиотека · The Laryngoscope · 2011

Pediatric endoscopic airway management with posterior cricoid rib grafting.

Provenzano Matthew J, Hulstein Stephanie L, Solomon Donald H, Bauman Nancy M, Manaligod Jose M, Kacmarynski Deborah S F, Smith Richard J H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To confirm and extend reported successful treatment of posterior glottic stenosis in pediatric patients using endoscopic laser division of the posterior cricoid plate with augmentation using costal cartilage.

STUDY

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review and case series.

METHODS

Medical records were examined to determine the surgical indications, outcomes, and postoperative complications of this procedure.

RESULTS

Twelve patients underwent the procedure, six females and six males, with an average age of 7 years (range, 2-26 years). There were 8/12 (67%) patients successfully decannulated after being tracheostomy dependent. There were no consistent anatomic abnormalities or surgical findings predictive of failure to decannulate. Average hospital stay was 3.6 days (range, 2-9 days). There were no deaths or other major complications; one patient had extrusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic posterior cricoid grafting is a valuable surgical option for patients with posterior glottic stenosis. The procedure is associated with low morbidity and permits decannulation in the majority of patients.

Для цитирования: Provenzano Matthew J, Hulstein Stephanie L, Solomon Donald H, Bauman Nancy M, Manaligod Jose M, Kacmarynski Deborah S F, Smith Richard J H. Pediatric endoscopic airway management with posterior cricoid rib grafting.. The Laryngoscope. 2011. DOI: 10.1002/lary.21579.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.