Aktuelle Urologie · 2010
[Differential indications in hydrocele operations - a contribution to prophylaxis for recurrent hydrocele].
Клинический случайСравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Laaser M K, Lent V
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In the operative treatment of idiopathic hydroceles the available techniques are frequently not selected as indicated according to the different expansions of hydroceles but rather the accustomed procedures are used.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis the methods and complications of hydrocele operations were evaluated.
RESULTS: From 1988 to 2008 195 hydroceles in 191 patients were operated upon: 22 (11.3 %) by eversion (according to Jaboulay), 27 (13.8 %) by resection (according to von Bergmann) and 146 (74.9 %) by a combination of resection and eversion (according to Kocher) of the tunica vaginalis communis. In 14 (7.2 %) patients the operation was indicated by a recurrent hydrocele, either after an eversion alone (n = 7) or after an insufficient resection (n = 7) of the tunica vaginalis communis. As complications of the operation an abscess occurred in 4 (21 %) cases, a haematoma in 5 (2.6 %) cases and a combination of both had to be reoperated in 2 (1.0 %) cases.
CONCLUSIONS: In order to prevent recurrent hydroceles the available methods for the operative treatment of idiopathic hydrocele should be selected according to the different expansions of the hydroceles and as such consequently executed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis the methods and complications of hydrocele operations were evaluated.
RESULTS: From 1988 to 2008 195 hydroceles in 191 patients were operated upon: 22 (11.3 %) by eversion (according to Jaboulay), 27 (13.8 %) by resection (according to von Bergmann) and 146 (74.9 %) by a combination of resection and eversion (according to Kocher) of the tunica vaginalis communis. In 14 (7.2 %) patients the operation was indicated by a recurrent hydrocele, either after an eversion alone (n = 7) or after an insufficient resection (n = 7) of the tunica vaginalis communis. As complications of the operation an abscess occurred in 4 (21 %) cases, a haematoma in 5 (2.6 %) cases and a combination of both had to be reoperated in 2 (1.0 %) cases.
CONCLUSIONS: In order to prevent recurrent hydroceles the available methods for the operative treatment of idiopathic hydrocele should be selected according to the different expansions of the hydroceles and as such consequently executed.