MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.oooo.2025.09.007

Медицинская библиотека · Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2025

Quantitative assessment of the temporomandibular joints in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta: a CBCT study.

Briner Michelle, Retrouvey Jean-Marc, Members of BBDC

СтатьяResearch Support, N.I.H., IntramuralПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate mandibular condylar volume and height in individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) compared to age- and sex-matched controls using CBCTs.

STUDY

DESIGN

This study included 48 OI patients and 48 matched controls. CBCTs were analyzed using 3DSlicer and Anatomage-InVivo6 software. Condylar volume and height were measured bilaterally. Data were analyzed using t-tests, ANOVA, and Tukey posthoc tests.

RESULTS

No sex-based differences in condylar volume were found in either OI or control patients. Volumetric developmental stage differences were significant only in OI patients. In OI patients, condylar height was significantly associated with sex on the right side only. In controls, no sex-based differences were found, but developmental stage differences were significant in the left condyle. No significant differences in volume or height were observed between OI types.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with OI, show significantly reduced condylar volume and height, indicating impaired and delayed condylar development consistent with their overall skeletal maturation delay.

Для цитирования: Briner Michelle, Retrouvey Jean-Marc, Members of BBDC. Quantitative assessment of the temporomandibular joints in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta: a CBCT study.. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2025.09.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.