MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/eja.0000000000001966

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of anaesthesiology · 2024

The novel rapid formulation of intravenous dantrolene (NPJ5008) versus standard dantrolene (Dantrium®): A clinical part-randomised phase 1 study in healthy volunteers.

Ng Kwet Shing Richard H, Clayton Lucy B, Smith Samuel L, Watson Marc J, McKenzie Litza M, Chalmers David P, Whitaker Gareth, Bilmen Jonathan G

Рандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование I фазыСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Delays in treating anaesthesia-induced malignant hyperthermia increase risks of complications and death. NPJ5008 is a novel formulation of the indicated treatment, dantrolene sodium, developed to shorten preparation and administration times compared with the reference formulation Dantrium®. The two formulations have been compared preclinically.

OBJECTIVES

Assess bioequivalence of overall dantrolene (free acid) exposure of NPJ5008 versus Dantrium® and ascertain similarities in their pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability profiles. Evaluate preparation/administration time savings for the new formulation.

DESIGN

Part 1 of this open-label trial in humans was a 1 : 1 randomised crossover study; part 2 was a single-arm study. Trial pharmacy data and laboratory simulations assessed preparation/administration step timings.

SETTING

Single clinical centre in the UK, April to July 2021.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-one healthy male and female individuals.

INTERVENTIONS: Part 1: single intravenous 60 mg dose of NPJ5008 or Dantrium®, sequentially. Part 2: single intravenous 120 mg dose of NPJ5008. Simulation: five vials per formulation using paediatric and adult cannulas.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall drug exposure to last measurable concentration (AUC 0 to last ) and extrapolated to infinity (AUC 0 to ∞ ) were primary endpoints. Other pharmacokinetic, clinical and muscle-function parameters, and adverse events, were monitored.

RESULTS

Adjusted geometric mean ratios of NPJ5008 versus Dantrium® were 90.24 and 90.44% for AUC 0 to last and AUC 0 to ∞ , respectively, with the 90% confidence intervals (CI) within the 80 to 125% acceptance interval, establishing bioequivalence. No new safety issues emerged: any adverse events were of a similar magnitude across treatments and related to pharmacological properties of dantrolene. Pharmacy and simulation data revealed that every step in preparation and administration was 26 to 69% faster for NPJ5008 than Dantrium®.

CONCLUSION

NPJ5008 showed comparable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles to Dantrium®, while reducing dantrolene dose preparation/administration times, potentially reducing patient complications/healthcare resourcing in malignant hyperthermia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Number: 2020-005719-35, MHRA approval.

Для цитирования: Ng Kwet Shing Richard H, Clayton Lucy B, Smith Samuel L, Watson Marc J, McKenzie Litza M, Chalmers David P, Whitaker Gareth, Bilmen Jonathan G. The novel rapid formulation of intravenous dantrolene (NPJ5008) versus standard dantrolene (Dantrium®): A clinical part-randomised phase 1 study in healthy volunteers.. European journal of anaesthesiology. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001966.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.