American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation · 2025
Optimizing Flatfoot Management With Foot Orthoses: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shim Sung Ryul, Kim Jong-Yeup, Shin Jieun, Lee Yung Jin, Park Jong Bum, Hong Mi Jin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of various foot orthoses for flatfoot through a network meta-analysis.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trials on flatfoot were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase (up to November 2024), including interventions like insoles, exercises, or no treatment, with clinical, biomechanical, and radiological outcomes.
RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials with 369 participants (mean age: 6.76-26.8 yrs) were included. Significant pain reductions were observed with both insole plus exercise (standardized mean difference -2.591; 95% confidence interval, -3.469 to -1.714) and insole alone (standardized mean difference -1.651; 95% confidence interval, -2.237 to -1.065). For navicular drop, improvements were found across all interventions, with exercise alone showing the greatest effect (standardized mean difference -3.058; 95% confidence interval, -4.290 to -1.826). Insole use improved calcaneal pitch (standardized mean difference 0.513; 95% confidence interval, 0.040 to 0.986). Biomechanical outcomes also improved, with insole use reducing center of pressure displacement (standardized mean difference -0.751; 95% confidence interval, -1.386 to -0.115; I 2 = 0%). Lateral talocalcaneal angles improved significantly in the insole group compared to control (standardized mean difference -0.572; 95% confidence interval, -1.047 to -0.097).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings strongly support insoles as an effective conservative treatment for flexible flatfoot and underscore the need to incorporate clinical, biomechanical, and radiographic outcomes in future research to optimize management strategies.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trials on flatfoot were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase (up to November 2024), including interventions like insoles, exercises, or no treatment, with clinical, biomechanical, and radiological outcomes.
RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials with 369 participants (mean age: 6.76-26.8 yrs) were included. Significant pain reductions were observed with both insole plus exercise (standardized mean difference -2.591; 95% confidence interval, -3.469 to -1.714) and insole alone (standardized mean difference -1.651; 95% confidence interval, -2.237 to -1.065). For navicular drop, improvements were found across all interventions, with exercise alone showing the greatest effect (standardized mean difference -3.058; 95% confidence interval, -4.290 to -1.826). Insole use improved calcaneal pitch (standardized mean difference 0.513; 95% confidence interval, 0.040 to 0.986). Biomechanical outcomes also improved, with insole use reducing center of pressure displacement (standardized mean difference -0.751; 95% confidence interval, -1.386 to -0.115; I 2 = 0%). Lateral talocalcaneal angles improved significantly in the insole group compared to control (standardized mean difference -0.572; 95% confidence interval, -1.047 to -0.097).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings strongly support insoles as an effective conservative treatment for flexible flatfoot and underscore the need to incorporate clinical, biomechanical, and radiographic outcomes in future research to optimize management strategies.