Success of Antegrade Continence Enema (ACE) in Pediatric Patients with Impaired Fecal Control.
Аннотация
We aimed to describe long-term outcome, treatment success, and complications of antegrade continence enema (ACE) procedures considering underlying etiologies and associated disorders.Overall, 180 patients undergoing ACE procedure at our institution during 1997-2019 were included in this retrospective study. Treatment success was defined as patient staying clean.The main underlying etiologies included spina bifida (n = 65, 36%), anorectal malformations (n = 58, 32%), Hirschsprung disease (n = 25, 14%), and functional constipation (n = 7, 4%). The most common complications were stomal leakage (n = 39, 22%), stenosis (n = 38, 21%), infection (n = 35, 19%), and granuloma/mucosal prolapse of the stoma (n = 34, 19%), and 29% (n = 52) of the patients reported functional problems. Overall, 48% of the patients (n = 87) experienced at least one ACE-related complication. At the latest follow-up, 61% of the patients were using ACE (n = 110), of whom 86% stayed clean (n = 95). Overall, ACE treatment was successful in 81% of patients (n = 144), defined as being clean with ACE in current use or after discontinuing ACE treatment as unnecessary. In total, 31% of the patients had stopped using ACE as unnecessary (n = 45). Spina bifida patients were least likely to discontinue ACE usage (n = 9, 14%), followed by anorectal malformation patients (n = 17, 29%), while 32% of Hirschsprung patients (n = 8) and 71% of constipation patients (n = 5) discontinued ACE as unnecessary.As previous studies have also shown, we demonstrated that ACE treatment can be successfully utilized in majority of children with impaired fecal control. Two-thirds of patients continued ACE treatment over 5 years of whom 86% patients were staying clean.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.