MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa053783

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2006

Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus.

Fowler Vance G, Boucher Helen W, Corey G Ralph, Abrutyn Elias, Karchmer Adolf W, Rupp Mark E, Levine Donald P, Chambers Henry F, Tally Francis P, Vigliani Gloria A, Cabell Christopher H, Link Arthur Stanley, DeMeyer Ignace, Filler Scott G, Zervos Marcus, Cook Paul, Parsonnet Jeffrey, Bernstein Jack M, Price Connie Savor, Forrest Graeme N, Fätkenheuer Gerd, Gareca Marcelo, Rehm Susan J, Brodt Hans Reinhardt, Tice Alan, Cosgrove Sara E, S. aureus Endocarditis and Bacteremia Study Group

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Alternative therapies for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis are needed.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 124 patients with S. aureus bacteremia with or without endocarditis to receive 6 mg of daptomycin intravenously per kilogram of body weight daily and 122 to receive initial low-dose gentamicin plus either an antistaphylococcal penicillin or vancomycin. The primary efficacy end point was treatment success 42 days after the end of therapy.

RESULTS

Forty-two days after the end of therapy in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, a successful outcome was documented for 53 of 120 patients who received daptomycin as compared with 48 of 115 patients who received standard therapy (44.2 percent vs. 41.7 percent; absolute difference, 2.4 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -10.2 to 15.1 percent). Our results met prespecified criteria for the noninferiority of daptomycin. The success rates were similar in subgroups of patients with complicated bacteremia, right-sided endocarditis, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Daptomycin therapy was associated with a higher rate of microbiologic failure than was standard therapy (19 vs. 11 patients, P=0.17). In 6 of the 19 patients with microbiologic failure in the daptomycin group, isolates with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin emerged; similarly, a reduced susceptibility to vancomycin was noted in isolates from patients treated with vancomycin. As compared with daptomycin therapy, standard therapy was associated with a nonsignificantly higher rate of adverse events that led to treatment failure due to the discontinuation of therapy (17 vs. 8, P=0.06). Clinically significant renal dysfunction occurred in 11.0 percent of patients who received daptomycin and in 26.3 percent of patients who received standard therapy (P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Daptomycin (6 mg per kilogram daily) is not inferior to standard therapy for S. aureus bacteremia and right-sided endocarditis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00093067 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Для цитирования: Fowler Vance G, Boucher Helen W, Corey G Ralph, Abrutyn Elias, Karchmer Adolf W, Rupp Mark E, Levine Donald P, Chambers Henry F, Tally Francis P, Vigliani Gloria A, Cabell Christopher H, Link Arthur Stanley, DeMeyer Ignace, Filler Scott G, Zervos Marcus, Cook Paul, Parsonnet Jeffrey, Bernstein Jack M, Price Connie Savor, Forrest Graeme N, Fätkenheuer Gerd, Gareca Marcelo, Rehm Susan J, Brodt Hans Reinhardt, Tice Alan, Cosgrove Sara E, S. aureus Endocarditis and Bacteremia Study Group. Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus.. The New England journal of medicine. 2006. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa053783.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.