MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/17518423.2021.2018518

Медицинская библиотека · Developmental neurorehabilitation · 2021

Comparison of the Upper and Lower Extremity and Trunk Muscle Masses between Children with Down Syndrome and Children with Typical Development.

Masaki Mitsuhiro, Maruyama Seina, Inagaki Yukika, Ogawa Yukine, Sato Yoshino, Yokota Minori, Takeuchi Moeka, Kasahara Maki, Minakawa Kota, Kato Kana, Sakaino Kenji

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Comparison of not only the upper and lower extremity but also trunk muscle masses measured by means of an ultrasound imaging device between children with Down syndrome (DS) and children with typical development (TD).

METHODS

The study included 35 children with TD (TD group) and 26 children with DS (DS group). The upper and lower extremity and trunk muscle thicknesses were measured using an ultrasound imaging device.

RESULTS

The thicknesses of the rectus abdominis, obliquus externus and internus abdominis, rectus femoris, and short head of the biceps femoris muscles were significantly lower in the DS group than in the TD group. The thicknesses of the other upper and lower extremity and trunk muscles did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrated lower masses of trunk flexor and knee extensor and flexor muscles in children with DS compared to those in children with TD.

Для цитирования: Masaki Mitsuhiro, Maruyama Seina, Inagaki Yukika, Ogawa Yukine, Sato Yoshino, Yokota Minori, Takeuchi Moeka, Kasahara Maki, Minakawa Kota, Kato Kana, Sakaino Kenji. Comparison of the Upper and Lower Extremity and Trunk Muscle Masses between Children with Down Syndrome and Children with Typical Development.. Developmental neurorehabilitation. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/17518423.2021.2018518.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.