DOI 10.3928/01913913-20170801-01
The Value of the Frontalis Suspension Procedure as a Repeat Intervention in Congenital Blepharoptosis.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the therapeutic benefits of frontalis suspension as a repeat intervention in congenital blepharoptosis.
METHODS
Pediatric patients diagnosed as having congenital ptosis who had at least 2 years of postoperative follow-up were included in this retrospective study. A successful outcome was defined as a postoperative margin-reflex distance of 3 mm or greater. The chi-square, Student's t, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used in comparisons.
RESULTS
Eighty-four eyes of 77 patients with a follow-up period of 8.4 ± 0.7 years were included. The initial surgery was levator resection in 29 (34.5%) eyes and frontalis suspension in 55 (65.5%) eyes. Frontalis suspension was performed for all repeat interventions (n = 20). Surgical success was achieved in 61.9% of patients with single surgery (75.9% for levator resection vs 54.5% for frontalis suspension; P = .06) and in 77.4% of patients following repeated surgeries (93.1% vs 69.1% for patients who initially underwent levator resection vs frontalis suspension, respectively; P = .012). A higher success rate was associated with better preoperative levator function (P = .01) and a higher margin-reflex distance (P = .004), and was inversely proportional to ptosis severity (P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS
Frontalis suspension as a repeat intervention for congenital blepharoptosis is associated with a further increase in long-term anatomic success rates and should be considered when initial procedures fail or remain inadequate. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2017;54(5):320-323.].
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.