MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1086/317473

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2000

Nonrespiratory Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection at a children's hospital.

Sattler C A, Mason E O, Kaplan S L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To describe Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in children, we reviewed the medical records of patients with isolates from nonrespiratory sites and identified 85 episodes, 51 (60%) of which represented true infection. Forty-two episodes (82.4%) were hospital acquired. Commonly associated with S. maltophilia infection were underlying illness (in 90.2% of cases), previous hospitalizations (in 78.7%), previous antibiotic exposure (in 78.4%), and the presence of a central venous catheter (in 76.5%). Polymicrobial isolates were obtained in 70.6% of episodes; Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species were the most common coisolates. Bloodstream infection was the most frequent clinical syndrome (32 [63%] of 51 episodes). Fever or sepsis occurred in 22 (69%) and shock in 10 (31%) of 32 episodes. Infection at other sites was less severe. The most active antibiotics in vitro were trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ticarcillin-clavulanate. The overall and attributable mortality rates were 12.5% and 6.3%, respectively. S. maltophilia appears to be an important cause of nosocomially acquired bacteremia in children. The significance in children of isolation from other sites is less clear.

Для цитирования: Sattler C A, Mason E O, Kaplan S L. Nonrespiratory Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection at a children's hospital.. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2000. DOI: 10.1086/317473.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.