MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2026.06.021

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2026

Prediction Model for Children With Anaphylaxis Who May Not Require Emergency Department Care: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Dribin Timothy E, Schnadower David, Sampson Hugh A, Zhang Yin, Zhang Nanhua, Freedman Stephen B, Neuman Mark I, Brousseau David C, Mistry Rakesh D, Boyd Stephanie, Wolnerman Yonatan, Walsh Patrick S, Wyst Craig Vander, Thapar Vandana, Strutt Jonathan, Srivastava Geetanjali, Singh Nidhi V, Russo Christopher J, Pulcini Christian D, Ngo Thuy L, Nesiama Jo-Ann O, Moake Matthew M, Metcalf Ashley M, Lubell Tamar R, Lee Juhee, Larsen Chari D, Kwan Karen Y, Knoles Curtis L, Khanna Kajal, Freeman Julia F, Davis Justin R, Daggett Alicia, Cohen Joanna S, Cohen Ari R, Chua Wee-Jhong, Chinta Sri S, Boswell Brittany, Bergmann Kelly R, Aronson Paul L, Michelson Kenneth A

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The 2023 US Anaphylaxis Practice Parameter indicated that some patients receiving epinephrine in the community might avoid emergency department (ED) visits; however, the criteria and safety of this approach remain unproven.

OBJECTIVE

To derive and validate a clinical prediction model for identifying children at risk of receiving epinephrine after arriving at the ED.

METHODS

We conducted a 31-center retrospective cohort study of children aged 6 months to less than 18 years who received 1 prehospital dose of epinephrine for allergic reactions between 2016 and 2019. The outcome was receipt of epinephrine after ED arrival. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression to derive the model in 70% of the patients to identify prehospital factors associated with epinephrine administration. Internal and external validations included 20% and 10% of the cohort, respectively.

RESULTS

The 2318 eligible patients had a median age of 8.4 years (interquartile range, 3.8-13.4), and 15.7% (n = 364) received epinephrine after ED arrival. Prehospital factors associated with the receipt of additional epinephrine included a history of asthma, cardiovascular symptoms before epinephrine, persistent symptoms after epinephrine, and any new/recurrent respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, or nonspecific symptoms after epinephrine. In the external validation, 30% (65 of 216) of encounters were classified as low risk. The presence of any risk factor had a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.80-0.98), specificity of 0.35 (95% CI, 0.28-0.43), positive predictive value of 0.25 (95% CI, 0.18-0.33), and negative predictive value of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99) for identifying patients who received epinephrine after ED arrival.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated a clinical prediction model to identify children treated with a single prehospital dose of epinephrine who may not require ED care. Implementation of the model could reduce avoidable ED visits for children with anaphylaxis.

Для цитирования: Dribin Timothy E, Schnadower David, Sampson Hugh A, Zhang Yin, Zhang Nanhua, Freedman Stephen B, Neuman Mark I, Brousseau David C, Mistry Rakesh D, Boyd Stephanie, Wolnerman Yonatan, Walsh Patrick S, Wyst Craig Vander, Thapar Vandana, Strutt Jonathan, Srivastava Geetanjali, Singh Nidhi V, Russo Christopher J, Pulcini Christian D, Ngo Thuy L, Nesiama Jo-Ann O, Moake Matthew M, Metcalf Ashley M, Lubell Tamar R, Lee Juhee, Larsen Chari D, Kwan Karen Y, Knoles Curtis L, Khanna Kajal, Freeman Julia F, Davis Justin R, Daggett Alicia, Cohen Joanna S, Cohen Ari R, Chua Wee-Jhong, Chinta Sri S, Boswell Brittany, Bergmann Kelly R, Aronson Paul L, Michelson Kenneth A. Prediction Model for Children With Anaphylaxis Who May Not Require Emergency Department Care: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.. The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2026.06.021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.