World neurosurgery · 2020
Vertebral Artery Terminating Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery (PICA-VA) as a Potential Risk Factor in Cervical Spine Surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aoyama Takeshi, Obara Naoshi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Unilateral vertebral artery (VA) injury is thought to not result in serious complications. The dominant-side VA should be preserved, although the importance of the nondominant-side VA has not been discussed. The injury of VA terminating posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA-VA) may result in cerebellar infarction. The characteristics of PICA-VA were evaluated.
METHODS: In study 1, results of head and neck magnetic resonance angiography were reviewed for 358 consecutive cases. VA diameter was measured at the V2 segment. Relationships between frequency of PICA-VA and asymmetry and diameter of the VA were analyzed. In study 2, results of magnetic resonance angiography were measured for 62 consecutive cases aged ≤39 years. Frequency of PICA-VA was compared between this young age group and 324 of the 358 cases aged ≥50 years.
RESULTS: Mean age for the total cohort was 67.8 ± 13.8 years (range, 10-94 years). PICA-VA was identified in 44 cases (12.3%). Mean diameter of all VAs was 3.2 ± 0.76 mm. Mean diameter of PICA-VA was 2.0 ± 0.55 mm, significantly smaller than the nondominant side in Confluence (+) (2.8 ± 0.59 mm; P < 0.001). Among the 56 VAs <2.0 mm, 26 (46.4%) were PICA-VA. PICA-VA was seen in 1 of the 62 cases aged ≤39 years (1.6%), and in 43 of the 324 cases aged ≥50 years (13.3%), showing a significantly lower frequency in the younger population (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Whether PICA-VA injury causes complications is not obvious. However, PICA-VA should also be preserved considering that potential risks exist. If the VA is small or shows a large difference in diameter between sides, special care should be taken during cervical spine surgery.
METHODS: In study 1, results of head and neck magnetic resonance angiography were reviewed for 358 consecutive cases. VA diameter was measured at the V2 segment. Relationships between frequency of PICA-VA and asymmetry and diameter of the VA were analyzed. In study 2, results of magnetic resonance angiography were measured for 62 consecutive cases aged ≤39 years. Frequency of PICA-VA was compared between this young age group and 324 of the 358 cases aged ≥50 years.
RESULTS: Mean age for the total cohort was 67.8 ± 13.8 years (range, 10-94 years). PICA-VA was identified in 44 cases (12.3%). Mean diameter of all VAs was 3.2 ± 0.76 mm. Mean diameter of PICA-VA was 2.0 ± 0.55 mm, significantly smaller than the nondominant side in Confluence (+) (2.8 ± 0.59 mm; P < 0.001). Among the 56 VAs <2.0 mm, 26 (46.4%) were PICA-VA. PICA-VA was seen in 1 of the 62 cases aged ≤39 years (1.6%), and in 43 of the 324 cases aged ≥50 years (13.3%), showing a significantly lower frequency in the younger population (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Whether PICA-VA injury causes complications is not obvious. However, PICA-VA should also be preserved considering that potential risks exist. If the VA is small or shows a large difference in diameter between sides, special care should be taken during cervical spine surgery.