MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70350-7

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of emergency medicine · 1994

Rectal bleeding in the pediatric emergency department.

Teach S J, Fleisher G R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVES

To describe the presumptive diagnoses in an unselected, ambulatory, pediatric population complaining of rectal bleeding; to determine how often those diagnoses changed with follow-up; and to determine how often the bleeding represented an acutely life-threatening condition.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Urban, tertiary care pediatric emergency department.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred four patients with 109 visits with a chief complaint of blood in the stool.

INTERVENTIONS: None.

MAIN

RESULTS

Follow-up was available on 95 of 109 visits (87.1%), with a mean duration of 7.5 months. A specific presumptive etiology was established for 73 of 109 patients (67%) at the initial ED visit and for 74 of 95 patients (77%) at follow-up. The etiologies varied markedly by age. Four patients (4.2%; 95% confidence interval, 0.2% to 8.2%) presented with a life-threatening condition (requiring an RBC transfusion or operative intervention): intussusception (three patients) and Meckel's diverticulum (one patient). Concordance between the ED diagnosis and the follow-up diagnosis was 81%.

CONCLUSION

A complaint of rectal bleeding is typically not life threatening in children. Emergency physicians normally are able to establish a presumptive diagnosis, which usually remains the same with follow-up.

Для цитирования: Teach S J, Fleisher G R. Rectal bleeding in the pediatric emergency department.. Annals of emergency medicine. 1994. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70350-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.