The Laryngoscope · 2000
Safety of neck rotation for ear surgery in children with Down syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Todd N W, Holt P J, Allen A T
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Seek information about spinal cord safety for children with Down syndrome positioned for ear surgery.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective consecutive patients, each serving as his or her own control.
METHODS: Somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded from 17 children who were undergoing elective otolaryngological surgery. None of the patients had neurological symptoms or physical examination findings suggesting cervical spinal cord embarrassment. Specifically, muscle tone was normal or mildly reduced globally, consistent with Down syndrome, and deep tendon reflexes were normal and not appreciably different in the upper and lower extremities. On plain lateral radiographs obtained in the neutral, flexed, and extended positions, the patients' cervical spines were normal.
RESULTS: When the anesthetized children had their necks placed in either right or left 60 degrees rotation, no significant change in somatosensory latency or amplitude was found. With more than 99.999% certainty, neurologically intact children with Down syndrome with normal plain cervical spine radiographs were not exposed to extra risks by 60 degrees neck rotation during surgery.
CONCLUSION: Patients with Down syndrome who are neurologically intact and who have normal lateral neck radiographs do not appear at great risk with neck rotation.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective consecutive patients, each serving as his or her own control.
METHODS: Somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded from 17 children who were undergoing elective otolaryngological surgery. None of the patients had neurological symptoms or physical examination findings suggesting cervical spinal cord embarrassment. Specifically, muscle tone was normal or mildly reduced globally, consistent with Down syndrome, and deep tendon reflexes were normal and not appreciably different in the upper and lower extremities. On plain lateral radiographs obtained in the neutral, flexed, and extended positions, the patients' cervical spines were normal.
RESULTS: When the anesthetized children had their necks placed in either right or left 60 degrees rotation, no significant change in somatosensory latency or amplitude was found. With more than 99.999% certainty, neurologically intact children with Down syndrome with normal plain cervical spine radiographs were not exposed to extra risks by 60 degrees neck rotation during surgery.
CONCLUSION: Patients with Down syndrome who are neurologically intact and who have normal lateral neck radiographs do not appear at great risk with neck rotation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAtlanto-Axial JointAtlanto-Occipital JointChildChild, PreschoolDown SyndromeEarElective Surgical ProceduresEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleHumansInfantIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleOdontoid ProcessOtorhinolaryngologic Surgical ProceduresPostureProspective StudiesRadiographySpinal Cord Compression