DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.04.030
Should we systematically perform central nervous system imaging in patients with Whipple's endocarditis?
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Whipple's endocarditis is an uncommon disease, with approximately 100 cases reported to date. Case series suggest that Whipple's endocarditis usually presents without extracardiac manifestations of Whipple's disease.
METHODS
We report 4 consecutive cases of Whipple's endocarditis associated with brain lesions. All patients fulfilled Duke Criteria for definite endocarditis. Whipple's disease was diagnosed through 16S rRNA polymerase chain reaction assays on valves excised from patients with culture-negative endocarditis (n=3) or through polymerase chain reaction and periodic acid staining-positive foamy macrophages on duodenal biopsy (n=1).
RESULTS
All patients were male, aged 56 to 72 years. They presented with mitral (n=1), aortic (n=1), mitral and aortic (n=1), and tricuspid (n=1) endocarditis. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed because of mild-to-moderate cognitive disorders (n=3) or ataxia (n=1) and revealed multiple (n=3) or solitary (n=1) contrast-enhancing lesions. Cerebrospinal fluid studies revealed meningitis in 1 case. Polymerase chain reaction assays on cerebrospinal fluid were negative for all patients. All patients received intravenous ceftriaxone (2-4 weeks) associated with gentamicin (2 weeks), followed by 1 year of oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, with favorable outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Whipple's associated central nervous system disease may be common but frequently undiagnosed, in patients with Whipple's endocarditis. Because treatment is different when neurologic disease is present (ie, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole vs doxycycline/hydroxychloroquine), clinicians should consider brain imaging in patients diagnosed with Whipple's endocarditis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.