DOI 10.1097/mao.0000000000004880
Effect of Using the External Auditory Canal Skin of the Healthy Side to Treat Unilateral Congenital Aural Atresia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether contralateral EAC skin grafts improve postoperative EAC health in patients with unilateral CAA undergoing atresiaplasty.
METHODS
A Zelen-design randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary referral hospital between July 2020 and February 2025. Seventy-four unilateral CAA patients were randomized into case group and control group. Case group: partial reconstruction using contralateral EAC full-thickness skin grafts; remaining defects repaired with 0.3-mm-thick temporal scalp grafts. Control group: entire EAC reconstructed with temporal scalp grafts during atresiaplasty. Pre- and postoperative pure-tone audiometry (PTA), high-resolution temporal bone CT, and postoperative otoscopic evaluation were recorded. Primary outcomes: hearing thresholds, complications (re-atresia or stenosis, tympanic membrane [TM] lateralization).
RESULTS
Complete recovery of the donor site from the healthy EAC was achieved in all 42 case-group patients. Fifty patients had follow-up >6 months, 28 patients were case group, and 22 were control group. There were significant air-bone gap (ABG) improvement between 2 groups (case group: 16.2 dB vs. control group: 9.1 dB; P <0.05). Case group demonstrated significantly less TM lateralization compared with control group ( χ 2 =4.711, P <0.05). TM lateralization correlated with poorer hearing outcomes ( P <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Contralateral EAC grafting techniques improved EAC health compared with conventional scalp grafts. Contralateral EAC grafting resulted in lower rate TM lateralization and better hearing outcomes than noncontralateral grafts.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.