MAGPI hypospadias repair: factors that determine outcome.

BACKGROUND

This is a review of our experience with the meatal advancement and glanuloplasty incorporated (MAGPI) hypospadias repair, and we point to some of the factors that determine outcome.

METHODS

We identified all patients who underwent MAGPI repair by a single surgeon over an 8-year period. We performed a retrospective chart review followed by telephone interview to assess parent satisfaction and also functional and cosmetic outcome. Decision to undergo this type of repair was intra-operative, depending on position and mobility of the meatus and the quality of peri-urethral tissue.

RESULTS

We identified 48 patients, with a median age of 19 months (8 months-13 years). Position of meatus was glanular (40) or coronal (eight cases). Chordee required correction in 40 % (12/30). Urethral stenting was required in one case. There was no case of fistula, meatal regression, stenosis, or second procedure. A single case of mucosal prolapse was encountered. The majority (47/48) were performed as a day-case. Forty parents agreed to telephone interview. Cosmetic outcome was deemed satisfactory in 95 % (38/40). With regard to unsatisfactory cosmetic outcome, one had a megameatus and the other was aged 13 years and developed a mucosal prolapse.

CONCLUSION

In selected cases, the MAGPI hypospadias repair provide excellent functional and cosmetic outcomes with minimal complications, and it can safely be performed as a day-case procedure.