MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.12.004

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric urology · 2013

Repair of hypospadias fistula using a penile skin advancement flap with penile dartos interposition.

Neilson A G, Nicholls G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We aim to report a single surgeon's experience of using a penile skin advancement flap with penile dartos interposition for hypospadias fistula repair.

PATIENTS &

METHODS

All hypospadias fistula repairs performed in our unit by this paediatric urologist between 2000 and 2012 were identified from a prospectively recorded database. Patients' case-notes were reviewed retrospectively gathering data on surgical technique, post-operative care and fistula recurrence on follow-up. Only those boys having repair by this advancement flap technique were included. A urethral catheter was left in situ in all patients for 5-7 days. Repairs performed using other techniques were excluded.

RESULTS

20 consecutive patients had fistula repair by the advancement flap technique. This was the primary repair in 19 boys, and was repair of a third fistula occurrence in one. The median age at fistula repair was 3.7 years (1.6-15.3). The median follow-up was 4 months (3-73). One boy failed to attend any follow-up. No recurrence has yet been identified in any of the 20 patients.

CONCLUSION

The penile skin advancement flap with dartos interposition technique was very successful in our series in both primary fistula repair, and in a patient who had multiple previous operations.

Для цитирования: Neilson A G, Nicholls G. Repair of hypospadias fistula using a penile skin advancement flap with penile dartos interposition.. Journal of pediatric urology. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.12.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.