Outcomes After Pediatric Diaphragmatic Plication: Open Versus Minimally Invasive Approaches.

PURPOSE: Diaphragmatic eventration is surgically treated with diaphragm plication, via laparoscopic, thoracoscopic, open transabdominal, or transthoracic approaches. We reviewed our center's experience with diaphragm plication to assess outcomes between surgical.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of patients who underwent diaphragmatic plication at our institution from 2012 to 2022. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed using nonparametric methods and regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 38 patients underwent 43 diaphragmatic plication procedures; nearly all children (n = 37) had at least one major cardiac, pulmonary, or tracheoesophageal comorbidity. Concurrent cardiac or tracheoesophageal surgery was associated with an open transthoracic approach (p = 0.007 and p = 0.025, respectively). Concurrent enteral access surgery was associated with a laparoscopic approach (p < 0.001). Across all 4 approaches, there were no differences in mortality, total recurrences, unplanned reintubations, time to extubation, or degree of respiratory support. Concurrent cardiac surgery was associated with postoperative mortality (8 deaths; p = 0.005); however, none were attributed to plication or occurred within 30 days of repair. Recurrence occurred in nine cases (20.9 %), with five undergoing reintervention (11.6 %); all were initially performed via open approaches, yielding significantly greater recurrence rates than minimally invasive approaches (25 % vs. 0 %, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive diaphragmatic plications are associated with significantly lower risk for recurrence requiring reintervention. Choice of surgical approach is partly related to the need for concurrent procedures (e.g. enteral access, cardiac surgery). In our population, comorbidities are prevalent, likely contributing to high morbidity and mortality. Hence, we recommend an individualized surgical approach and prioritization of minimally invasive methods when suitable.

TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Cohort Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.