MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/rct.0000000000001871

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of computer assisted tomography · 2026

Automated Quantitative Analysis of Enhancing and Peritumoral Cerebral Blood Volume for Differentiating Glioblastoma From Central Nervous System Lymphoma.

Murayama Kazuhiro, Harada Shohei, Ohba Shigeo, Maki Hiroyuki, Kumazawa Yunosuke, Hanamatsu Satomu, Tamokami Keigo, Nishikimi Keitaro, Ishikawa Saki, Ikeda Hirotaka, Tamura Kentaro, Inoue Masanori

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively compare cerebral blood volume (CBV) in contrast-enhancing tumor areas and nonenhancing peritumoral fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintense regions between glioblastoma and central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL), and to assess the incremental diagnostic value of peritumoral CBV beyond enhancing tumor CBV.

METHODS

The study included 34 patients with histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma (n=22) or CNSL (n=12) who underwent pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging, including FLAIR, dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Automated regions of interest (ROIs) were defined for enhancement areas (EAs) and nonenhancing peritumoral FLAIR abnormalities (PFAs). Quantitative indices included the median CBV within EAs (CBV EA ) and the 95th percentile CBV within PFAs (CBV PFA ). Intergroup differences were assessed, and diagnostic performance was evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models incorporating CBV EA and CBV PFA , receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and likelihood ratio testing (LRT).

RESULTS

Both CBV EA and CBV PFA were significantly higher in the glioblastoma group than in the CNSL group [CBV EA : 4.90 (4.14-5.58) vs. 2.84 (2.04-3.21) mL/100 g, P <0.0001, CBV PFA : 5.67 (3.75-8.08) vs. 4.10 (3.00-5.23) mL/100 g; P =0.029]. CBV EA showed the highest discriminatory performance in univariate analysis, whereas CBV PFA demonstrated a more modest association with tumor type. Although the AUC of the combined model was not significantly different from that of the CBV EA model alone [CBV EA : 0.913 (0.816-1.000) vs. combined model: 0.932 (0.848-1.000), P =0.602], the combined model showed a significant improvement in model fit according to LRT (χ 2 =4.1, P =0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Automated ROI-based analysis demonstrated significant differences in peritumoral CBV between glioblastoma and CNSL, and adding peritumoral CBV to the logistic regression model significantly improved overall model fit for differentiating between these entities beyond enhancing tumor CBV alone.

Для цитирования: Murayama Kazuhiro, Harada Shohei, Ohba Shigeo, Maki Hiroyuki, Kumazawa Yunosuke, Hanamatsu Satomu, Tamokami Keigo, Nishikimi Keitaro, Ishikawa Saki, Ikeda Hirotaka, Tamura Kentaro, Inoue Masanori. Automated Quantitative Analysis of Enhancing and Peritumoral Cerebral Blood Volume for Differentiating Glioblastoma From Central Nervous System Lymphoma.. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2026. DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001871.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.