Pediatric research · 2022
Venous waveform analysis detects acute right ventricular failure in a rat respiratory arrest model.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lefevre Ryan J, Barajas Matthew B, Balzer Claudius, Baudenbacher Franz J, Riess Matthias L, Staudt Genevieve, Hernandez Antonio, Eagle Susan S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Peripheral intravenous analysis (PIVA) has been shown to be more sensitive than central venous pressure (CVP) for detecting hemorrhage and volume overload. We hypothesized that PIVA is superior to CVP for detecting right ventricular (RV) failure in a rat model of respiratory arrest.
METHODS: Eight Wistar rats were studied in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines. CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and PIVA were recorded. Respiratory arrest was achieved with IV Rocuronium. PIVA utilizes Fourier transform to quantify the amplitude of the peripheral venous waveform, expressed as the "f1 amplitude". RV diameter was measured with transthoracic echocardiography.
RESULTS: RV diameter increased from 0.34 to 0.54 cm during arrest, p = 0.001, and returned to 0.33 cm post arrest, p = 0.97. There was an increase in f1 amplitude from 0.07 to 0.38 mmHg, p = 0.01 and returned to 0.08 mmHg, p = 1.0. MAP decreased from 119 to 67 mmHg, p = 0.004 and returned to 136 mmHg, p = 0.50. There was no significant increase in CVP from 9.3 mmHg at baseline to 10.5 mmHg during respiratory arrest, p = 0.91, and recovery to 8.6 mmHg, p = 0.81.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the utility of PIVA to detect RV failure in small-caliber vessels, comparable to peripheral veins in the human pediatric population.
IMPACT: Right ventricular failure remains a diagnostic challenge, particularly in pediatric patients with small vessel sizes limiting invasive intravascular monitor use. Intravenous analysis has shown promise in detecting hypovolemia and volume overload. Intravenous analysis successfully detects right ventricular failure in a rat respiratory arrest model. Intravenous analysis showed utility despite utilizing small peripheral venous access and therefore may be applicable to a pediatric population. Intravenous analysis may be helpful in differentiating various types of shock.
METHODS: Eight Wistar rats were studied in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines. CVP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and PIVA were recorded. Respiratory arrest was achieved with IV Rocuronium. PIVA utilizes Fourier transform to quantify the amplitude of the peripheral venous waveform, expressed as the "f1 amplitude". RV diameter was measured with transthoracic echocardiography.
RESULTS: RV diameter increased from 0.34 to 0.54 cm during arrest, p = 0.001, and returned to 0.33 cm post arrest, p = 0.97. There was an increase in f1 amplitude from 0.07 to 0.38 mmHg, p = 0.01 and returned to 0.08 mmHg, p = 1.0. MAP decreased from 119 to 67 mmHg, p = 0.004 and returned to 136 mmHg, p = 0.50. There was no significant increase in CVP from 9.3 mmHg at baseline to 10.5 mmHg during respiratory arrest, p = 0.91, and recovery to 8.6 mmHg, p = 0.81.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the utility of PIVA to detect RV failure in small-caliber vessels, comparable to peripheral veins in the human pediatric population.
IMPACT: Right ventricular failure remains a diagnostic challenge, particularly in pediatric patients with small vessel sizes limiting invasive intravascular monitor use. Intravenous analysis has shown promise in detecting hypovolemia and volume overload. Intravenous analysis successfully detects right ventricular failure in a rat respiratory arrest model. Intravenous analysis showed utility despite utilizing small peripheral venous access and therefore may be applicable to a pediatric population. Intravenous analysis may be helpful in differentiating various types of shock.