MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1148/radiology.210.3.r99fe43785

Медицинская библиотека · Radiology · 1999

Injuries of the pectoralis major muscle: evaluation with MR imaging.

Connell D A, Potter H G, Sherman M F, Wickiewicz T L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows evaluation of injuries of the pectoralis major muscle.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Fifteen men underwent MR imaging after injury of the pectoralis major muscle. Most of the patients (nine of 15) were injured while lifting weights, notably bench-pressing. The injuries were evaluated for abnormal morphology and signal intensity, specifically the site of injury, degree of tearing, and amount of tendon retraction.

RESULTS

Six injuries occurred at the musculotendinous junction, and five were treated conservatively; eight of the nine cases of distal tendon avulsion were treated with primary surgical repair. The MR imaging findings were confirmed in the nine cases treated surgically. Complete tears (three of 15) were less common than partial tears (12 of 15). The sternal and clavicular heads were torn in 10 patients, only the clavicular head was torn in two patients, and only the sternal head was torn in three patients. Acute tears (10 of 15) demonstrated hemorrhage and edema, whereas chronic tears (five of 15) demonstrated fibrosis and scarring. There was a variable amount of tendon retraction.

CONCLUSION

MR imaging allows accurate evaluation of injuries of the pectoralis major muscle and enables identification of patients who would benefit from surgical repair.

Для цитирования: Connell D A, Potter H G, Sherman M F, Wickiewicz T L. Injuries of the pectoralis major muscle: evaluation with MR imaging.. Radiology. 1999. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.210.3.r99fe43785.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.