Pediatric radiology · 2006
Muscle changes in brachial plexus birth injury with elbow flexion contracture: an MRI study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pöyhiä Tiina H, Koivikko Mika P, Peltonen Jari I, Kirjavainen Mikko O, Lamminen Antti E, Nietosvaara A Yrjänä
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Muscle pathology of the arm and forearm in brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) with elbow flexion contracture has not been evaluated with MRI.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether limited range of motion of the elbow in BPBI is correlated with specific patterns of muscular pathology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 15 BPBI patients, total active motion (TAM) of the elbow (extension-flexion) and the forearm (pronation-supination) were measured. MRI of the elbow joints and musculature allowed assessment of elbow congruency. Fatty infiltration and size reduction of the muscles were graded semiquantitatively.
RESULTS: Mean TAM of the elbow was 113 degrees (50 degrees-140 degrees) and that of the forearm 91 degrees (10 degrees-165 degrees). The greater the size reduction of the brachioradialis muscle, the more diminished was elbow TAM. The more extensive the BPBI and muscle pathology of the pronator teres muscle, the more limited was the TAM of the forearm. Pathology of the supinator and brachialis muscles was evident in every patient.
CONCLUSION: Extensive BPBI may result in marked limitation of TAM. Elbow flexion contracture seems to be caused mainly by brachialis muscle pathology. Prosupination of the forearm is better preserved when the pronator teres is not severely affected. MRI can reliably show the extent of muscle pathology in BPBI.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether limited range of motion of the elbow in BPBI is correlated with specific patterns of muscular pathology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 15 BPBI patients, total active motion (TAM) of the elbow (extension-flexion) and the forearm (pronation-supination) were measured. MRI of the elbow joints and musculature allowed assessment of elbow congruency. Fatty infiltration and size reduction of the muscles were graded semiquantitatively.
RESULTS: Mean TAM of the elbow was 113 degrees (50 degrees-140 degrees) and that of the forearm 91 degrees (10 degrees-165 degrees). The greater the size reduction of the brachioradialis muscle, the more diminished was elbow TAM. The more extensive the BPBI and muscle pathology of the pronator teres muscle, the more limited was the TAM of the forearm. Pathology of the supinator and brachialis muscles was evident in every patient.
CONCLUSION: Extensive BPBI may result in marked limitation of TAM. Elbow flexion contracture seems to be caused mainly by brachialis muscle pathology. Prosupination of the forearm is better preserved when the pronator teres is not severely affected. MRI can reliably show the extent of muscle pathology in BPBI.